Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks! On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4. > > Upayavira > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote: >> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101 into >> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if there are >> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch >> >> Tim >> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: >> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the >> > feature >> > freeze starts. >> > >> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I >> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the >> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5. >> > >> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets: >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker >> > "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes >> > issue with replication" >> > >> > Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release? >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical >> > "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp" >> > >> > This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense. >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical >> > "Add tests for bin/post" >> > >> > Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a >> > release >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical >> > "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)" >> > >> > Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker? >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker >> > "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x" >> > >> > Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not >> > consider this a blocker either. >> > >> > - o - >> > >> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. >> > Anyone >> > have comments/observations here? >> > >> > I will create the branch shortly. >> > >> > Upayavira >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org