Hi,

I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and running
tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.


On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
> pointing at the 5.4 branch.
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> > thx :-)
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
> > > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch creation
> > > mail
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one
> already
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US, lots
> of
> > > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised if
> > > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Upayavira
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
> > > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101
> into
> > > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if there
> are
> > > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Tim
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this
> moment, the feature
> > > >>>>> > freeze starts.
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix
> version 5.4. I
> > > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I
> expect that the
> > > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham,
> Noble) blocker
> > > >>>>> >   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
> authorization causes
> > > >>>>> > issue with replication"
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> >   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before
> the release?
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik)
> critical
> > > >>>>> >   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> >   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik)
> critical
> > > >>>>> >   "Add tests for bin/post"
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> >   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of
> holding back a
> > > >>>>> > release
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe)
> critical
> > > >>>>> >   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java
> 9 (b71)"
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> >   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin,
> others), blocker
> > > >>>>> >   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> >   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I
> will not
> > > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> >   - o -
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of
> attention. Anyone
> > > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
> > > >>>>> >
> > > >>>>> > Upayavira
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > > > Noble Paul
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > > Noble Paul
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>


-- 
Anshum Gupta

Reply via email to