If the size of historic jars is the problem here, would looking into git-lfs 
for *.jar be one workaround? I might also be totally off here :-)

--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com

> 6. des. 2015 kl. 00.46 skrev Scott Blum <dragonsi...@gmail.com>:
> 
> If lucene was a new project being started today, is there any question about 
> whether it would be managed in svn or git?  If not, this might be a good 
> impetus for moving to a better world.
> 
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Yonik Seeley <ysee...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:ysee...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 5:53 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:david.w.smi...@gmail.com>
> <david.w.smi...@gmail.com <mailto:david.w.smi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > I understand Gus; but we’d like to separate the question of wether we should
> > move from svn to git from fixing the git mirror.
> 
> Except moving to git is one path to fixing the issue, so it's not
> really separate.
> Give the multiple problems that the svn-git bridge seems to have (both
> memory leaks + history), perhaps the sooner we switch to git, the
> better.
> 
> -Yonik
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org 
> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org 
> <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org>
> 
> 

Reply via email to