If the size of historic jars is the problem here, would looking into git-lfs for *.jar be one workaround? I might also be totally off here :-)
-- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > 6. des. 2015 kl. 00.46 skrev Scott Blum <dragonsi...@gmail.com>: > > If lucene was a new project being started today, is there any question about > whether it would be managed in svn or git? If not, this might be a good > impetus for moving to a better world. > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Yonik Seeley <ysee...@gmail.com > <mailto:ysee...@gmail.com>> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 5:53 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com > <mailto:david.w.smi...@gmail.com> > <david.w.smi...@gmail.com <mailto:david.w.smi...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I understand Gus; but we’d like to separate the question of wether we should > > move from svn to git from fixing the git mirror. > > Except moving to git is one path to fixing the issue, so it's not > really separate. > Give the multiple problems that the svn-git bridge seems to have (both > memory leaks + history), perhaps the sooner we switch to git, the > better. > > -Yonik > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> > >