[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15080763#comment-15080763 ]
Shai Erera commented on SOLR-8475: ---------------------------------- Thanks [~anshumg]. So [~yo...@apache.org], with the latest patch, do you have any more concerns? If not, I'll commit it. > Some refactoring to SolrIndexSearcher > ------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-8475 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8475 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: search > Reporter: Shai Erera > Assignee: Shai Erera > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 5.5, Trunk > > Attachments: SOLR-8475.patch, SOLR-8475.patch, SOLR-8475.patch, > SOLR-8475.patch, SOLR-8475.patch > > > While reviewing {{SolrIndexSearcher}}, I started to correct a thing here and > there, and eventually it led to these changes: > * Moving {{QueryCommand}} and {{QueryResult}} to their own classes. > * Moving FilterImpl into a private static class (was package-private and > defined in the same .java file, but separate class). > * Some code formatting, imports organizing and minor log changes. > * Removed fieldNames (handled the TODO in the code) > * Got rid of usage of deprecated classes such as {{LegacyNumericUtils}} and > {{Legacy-*-Field}}. > I wish we'd cut down the size of this file much more (it's 2500 lines now), > but I've decided to stop here so that the patch is manageable. I would like > to explore further refactorings afterwards, e.g. extracting cache management > code to an outer class (but keep {{SolrIndexSearcher}}'s API the same, if > possible). > If you have additional ideas of more cleanups / simplifications, I'd be glad > to do them. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org