what's the status of 5.3.2 release ?

On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> Thanks for committing those David.
>
> I just brought everything in synch on the 5.3.2 change log section on all
> the branches.
>
> I have also committed everything but I want to also commit SOLR-8470 before
> cutting the RC (unless someone objects). In case someone has something else
> to back port, kindly do so today.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 8:38 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
> <david.w.smi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Yikes; I’m sure that was painful.
>>
>> So I just back-ported a couple issues, SOLR-8340 & SOLR-8059.  I was about
>> to manually keep the 5.3.2 section in branch_5x & trunk in sync but then
>> thought better of it.  Might as well wait until 5.3.2 is voted and then do
>> it, since there are bound to be others who want to do the same, so why
>> bother with the intermediate bookkeeping.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 8:13 AM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry for the long delay but I burnt my hand and so have been MIA. It's
>>> better now so I'll port the issues and cut an RC on Wednesday.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've added the section for 5.3.2 in all the branches. Kindly back-port
>>>> stuff that you think makes sense to go into a 'bug-fix' release for 5.3.1
>>>> only.
>>>>
>>>> I think it'd make sense to duplicate entries for JIRAs we back port.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Seems like Noble ran addVersion.py for 5.3.2 on the lucene_solr_5_3
>>>>> branch during the 5.3.1 release.
>>>>> I can now run it for branch_5x and trunk with the old change id but
>>>>> there are a ton of property changes to multiple files. Can someone confirm
>>>>> that it'd be fine? The addVersion on 5.3.2, that I'm trying to merge onto
>>>>> branch_5x and trunk was done before 5.4 was released.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, the change log entry for 5.3.2 is right above 5.3.1 and not
>>>>> chronological i.e. at the top. I think that is how it should be unless
>>>>> someone has some different ideas.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/16/2015 1:08 PM, Anshum Gupta wrote:
>>>>>> > There are a bunch of important bug fixes that call for a 5.3.2 in my
>>>>>> > opinion. I'm specifically talking about security plugins related
>>>>>> > fixes
>>>>>> > but I'm sure there are others too.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Unless someone else wants to do it, I'd volunteer to do the release
>>>>>> > and cut an RC next Tuesday.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sounds like a reasonable idea to me.  I assume these must be fixes
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> are not yet backported.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I happen to have the 5.3 branch on my dev system, with SOLR-6188
>>>>>> applied.  It is already up to date.  There's nothing in the 5.3.2
>>>>>> section of either CHANGES.txt file.  The svn log indicates that
>>>>>> nothing
>>>>>> has been backported since the 5.3.1 release was cut.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps SOLR-6188 could be added to the list of fixes to backport.  I
>>>>>> believe it's a benign change.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thinking about CHANGES.txt, this might work for the 5.3 branch:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----
>>>>>> ======================= Lucene 5.3.2 =======================
>>>>>> All changes were backported from 5.4.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bug Fixes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * LUCENE-XXXX: A description (Committer Name)
>>>>>> ----
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If we decide it's a good idea to mention the release in trunk and
>>>>>> branch_5x, something like the following might work, because that file
>>>>>> should already contain the full change descriptions:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----
>>>>>> ======================= Lucene 5.3.2 =======================
>>>>>> The following issues were backported from 5.4.0:
>>>>>> LUCENE-XXXX
>>>>>> LUCENE-YYYY
>>>>>> ----
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Shawn
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>> --
>> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
>> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to