Agree with Shawn here.

If a company has already done the work to upgrade their systems to
5.3.1 , they would rather have a bug fix for the old version .

So anshum, is there a 5.3.2 version created in JIRA? can we start
tagging issues to that release so that we can have a definitive list
of bugs to be backported

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> Thanks for explaining it so well Shawn :)
>
> Yes, that's pretty much the reason why it makes sense to have a 5.3.2
> release.
>
> We might even need a 5.4.1 after that as there are more security bug fixes
> that are getting committed as the feature is being tried by users and bugs
> are being reported.
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/16/2015 2:15 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>> > Why don't people just upgrade to 5.4? Why do we need another release in
>> > the 5.3.x range?
>>
>> I am using a third-party custom Solr plugin.  The latest version of that
>> plugin (which I have on my dev server) has only been certified to work
>> with Solr 5.3.x.  There's a chance that it won't work with 5.4, so I
>> cannot use that version yet.  If I happen to need any of the fixes that
>> are being backported, an official 5.3.2 release would allow me to use
>> official binaries, which will make my managers much more comfortable
>> than a version that I compile myself.
>>
>> Additionally, the IT change policies in place for many businesses
>> require a huge amount of QA work for software upgrades, but those
>> policies may be relaxed for hotfixes and upgrades that are *only*
>> bugfixes.  For users operating under those policies, a bugfix release
>> will allow them to fix bugs immediately, rather than spend several weeks
>> validating a new minor release.
>>
>> There is a huge amount of interest in the new security features in
>> 5.3.x, functionality that has a number of critical problems.  Lots of
>> users who need those features have already deployed 5.3.1.  Many of the
>> critical problems are fixed in 5.4, and these are the fixes that Anshum
>> wants to make available in 5.3.2.  If a user is in either of the
>> situations that I outlined above, upgrading to 5.4 may be unrealistic.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shawn
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to