On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Mike for volunteering!

You're welcome!

> I wanted to get SOLR-8619 in for 5.5.0, I'll mark that as a blocker as it
> can potentially cause data loss. I'm currently working on that.

Hmm this is a little concerning: I don't see a patch on the issue, not
even for a test case showing the problem?  No comments for the past
1.5 weeks or so?

There seems to be a lot of design level discussion there about what
the issue(s) are, how to fix it, etc.?  It's risky to rush in a fix in
just before a release.

We can do a 5.5.1 in short order with this fix?

Alternatively, we could roll the release bits just for Lucene 5.5.0,
and Solr 5.5.0 is released later.

> I also have a bunch of Solr related stuff I wanted to commit before moving
> on the 6.0 path so back-compat wouldn't be a problem, but we can always have
> another deprecation release before 6.0 if needed, specially once we have the
> git based release process ironed out.
>
> I am not saying we WILL have another 5.x release, just a thought. It all
> depends on the release timeline for 6.0 :)

Hmm, I expect 5.5 will be the last 5.x feature release, i.e. we can do
5.5.x bug fix releases, but I don't think we should do another 5.x
feature release once we release 6.0.  The next feature release should
be 6.1 after that?  Or maybe only Solr could do a 5.6.0?

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to