> "git: %(repo_name)s:%(shortbranch)s: %(subject)s" Looks good to me. I'd keep the repo name regardless of whether it's the main repo or not.
Dawid On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Shawn Heisey <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/19/2016 6:04 PM, Ryan Ernst wrote: >> >> This sounds good, but isn't the repo name redundant given it is >> implied by the email going to [email protected]? >> > > Right now, I think the only git repository we've got is lucene-solr, but > we also receive commit emails from the subversion repository that holds > the Lucene and Solr websites. That repository will probably also be > converted to git eventually. > > What would be really nice is to have the repo name removed if it's the > main code repository (lucene-solr in our case) and kept if it's > something else, but as Hoss mentioned, Infra probably will not be > willing to handle a lot of customization to the script that sends these > messages. There is probably more configurability than they *want* to > support already. > > Thanks, > Shawn > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
