[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15235622#comment-15235622
 ] 

Scott Stults commented on SOLR-3191:
------------------------------------

Since this is essentially a wholesale rewrite of SolrReturnFields, would it be 
easier to manage if it was a separate extension of ReturnFields? That brings up 
another problem, namely, where we would configure that. We'd gain some 
flexibility in how the ResponseWriters treat return fields, so maybe that's a 
good place to select the particular ReturnFields implementation.

Kinda spitballing here because I know there is at least one ResponseWriter that 
requires special handling (CSV) and I suspect GeoJSONResponseWriter might need 
more (haven't looked yet).

> field exclusion from fl
> -----------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-3191
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3191
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Luca Cavanna
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: SOLR-3191.patch, SOLR-3191.patch, SOLR-3191.patch, 
> SOLR-3191.patch, SOLR-3191.patch, SOLR-3191.patch
>
>
> I think it would be useful to add a way to exclude field from the Solr 
> response. If I have for example 100 stored fields and I want to return all of 
> them but one, it would be handy to list just the field I want to exclude 
> instead of the 99 fields for inclusion through fl.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to