[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15235930#comment-15235930 ]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-3191: ------------------------------------- The failure for GeoJSONResponseWriter will most likely have to do with 'fields' vs 'okFields' -- that is, the fields we need to request from Lucene, and 'okFields' the fields that need to be returned to the end user. > a separate extension of ReturnFields? ugg -- unless there is a really good reason, we should avoid this > field exclusion from fl > ----------------------- > > Key: SOLR-3191 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3191 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Luca Cavanna > Priority: Minor > Attachments: SOLR-3191.patch, SOLR-3191.patch, SOLR-3191.patch, > SOLR-3191.patch, SOLR-3191.patch, SOLR-3191.patch > > > I think it would be useful to add a way to exclude field from the Solr > response. If I have for example 100 stored fields and I want to return all of > them but one, it would be handy to list just the field I want to exclude > instead of the 99 fields for inclusion through fl. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org