[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15237642#comment-15237642
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-7202:
-------------------------------------
I would also recommend we restrict names to 3 syllables. Here is how i see it
{quote}
GeoPoint: 1 dimension with morton z encoding -> GeoMortonZLatLonPoint
{quote}
Why? such a complicated name. Why do we need Geo? Why do we need Morton if we
have Z? Why not just MortonPoint?
{quote}
LatLonPoint: 2 dimensions -> GeoLatLonPoint
{quote}
Putting Geo in front of this is not helping. Why not just LatLonPoint?
{quote}
Geo3dPoint: 3 dimensions -> GeoXYZPoint
{quote}
Putting Geo in front of this doesn't help. Why not just XYZPoint?
> Come up with a comprehensive proposal for naming spatial modules and
> technologies
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-7202
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7202
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: modules/sandbox, modules/spatial, modules/spatial3d
> Affects Versions: master
> Reporter: Karl Wright
>
> There are three different spatial implementations circulating at the moment,
> and nobody seems happy with the naming of them. For each implementation
> strategy, we need both a module name and a descriptive technology name that
> we can use to distinguish one from the other. I would expect the following
> people to have an interest in this process: [~rcmuir], [~dsmiley],
> [~mikemccand], etc.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
