[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15238093#comment-15238093
]
Ryan Ernst commented on LUCENE-7202:
------------------------------------
bq. If I want to support Hilbert or Moore we add HilbertPoint, MoorePoint?
Yes I think so? I think that makes a lot of sense, since the data impls can be
independent of other point types?
bq. Geo3dPoint: 3 dimensions
I proposed PlanetPoint for the "3d" version. Then we can have the same lat/lon
signature methods that are added now (which should use a sphere model, not
ellipsoid, because it should match exactly how LatLonPoint models the earth),
and then alternative methods that take PlanetModel.
> Come up with a comprehensive proposal for naming spatial modules and
> technologies
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-7202
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7202
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: modules/sandbox, modules/spatial, modules/spatial3d
> Affects Versions: master
> Reporter: Karl Wright
>
> There are three different spatial implementations circulating at the moment,
> and nobody seems happy with the naming of them. For each implementation
> strategy, we need both a module name and a descriptive technology name that
> we can use to distinguish one from the other. I would expect the following
> people to have an interest in this process: [~rcmuir], [~dsmiley],
> [~mikemccand], etc.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
