[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15238225#comment-15238225 ]
Karl Wright commented on LUCENE-7202: ------------------------------------- bq. Just a quick thought on the Cartesian/Spherical/Ellipsoidal naming. We did this at my last job and the maintenance / code sprawl was a nightmare. I would hope that the implementation itself was parameterized, and that there would be well-considered class hierarchy. The only difference between EllipsoidalPoint and SphericalPoint would therefore be the choice of PlanetModel. This kind of design would control maintenance and code sprawl. > Come up with a comprehensive proposal for naming spatial modules and > technologies > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-7202 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7202 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: modules/sandbox, modules/spatial, modules/spatial3d > Affects Versions: master > Reporter: Karl Wright > > There are three different spatial implementations circulating at the moment, > and nobody seems happy with the naming of them. For each implementation > strategy, we need both a module name and a descriptive technology name that > we can use to distinguish one from the other. I would expect the following > people to have an interest in this process: [~rcmuir], [~dsmiley], > [~mikemccand], etc. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org