I don't think it is lost, it's likely my mistake in adding a top level common-build for the validation stuff. We can change it out.
On Mar 28, 2011, at 8:27 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > the real question is: why is this fixed only in the 3.1 branch? > > how did our 3.1 branch and 3.x/trunk get so different? I don't like > that any work done to get 3.1 out the door is going to be "lost" and > have to be re-done. > > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Andi Vajda <va...@osafoundation.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> It seems that at this time, the HEAD of branch_3x can no longer be >> conveniently checked out with Lucene sources only. >> >> If I check out >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/lucene >> I'm not getting the common-build.xml file from above that the Lucene one >> depends on. If I checkout branch_3x, I get Solr sources as well. >> >> Is this intentional or an oversight ? >> >> Andi.. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
