I would rather not rebuild for L-2996. This issue has a known workaround. As for the sources issue that Andi brought up, it never effected 3.1 b/c it doesn't have the validation stuff.
I'd like to stick w/ the artifacts we have. On Mar 28, 2011, at 11:33 AM, Shai Erera wrote: > If you're talking about LUCENE-2996, then note that I haven't checked in the > code yet. If you're going to rebuild the artifacts off of > branches/lucene_solr_3_1, I can check in the code there now. > > Shai > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > If we we have to rebuild the artifacts, should we add Shai/Mike's > > addIndexes() fix, too? > > > > 3.1 branch is fine with regards to this issue, thats why I raised my > question... it seems only the 3.1 release branch was "fixed" for this > but trunk and branch_3x are broken. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
