Looks like we have a 'lazy consensus', in that, no one has raised any significant objections, a few minor modifications have been suggested (which sound totally reasonable), and those who did vote were positive.
Barring any objections, this vote passes. Since DIGY and Scott seem to have gotten the bulk of the work on 2.9.4 finished, I think now is a good time to start the directory layout changes, and it won't be too intrusive to any active commits. I'll start on that this week. If you have any pending commits that would be totally screwed up by this directory change, please finalize those as soon as possible! Otherwise I'll be moving things around and your patches/commits might not be able to find the appropriate files. Thanks, Troy On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Any more thoughts on the directory structure? > > Quick Recap: > > We have Troy's original proposal here: > http://people.apache.org/~thoward/Lucene.Net/directory-structure-example/ > > bin/ > build/ (various solution and project files) > vs2008/ > vs2010/ > doc/ > lib/ - third party libraries to make it easy to pull down the source and go > src/ > contrib/ > core/ > demo/ > test/ > contrib/ > core/ > demo/ > > From here, I further suggested cleaning up the contrib folder - because we > have extra folders: > > src/contrib/contrib.net/contrib.net/ -> src/contrib/contrib.net/ > src/contrib/snowball/snowball.net/ -> src/contrib/Snowball.net/ > > Digy further suggested dropping the .net in all those folders above, and > finding a better name for contrib.net. > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------- >> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:41:17 +0200 >> From: digyd...@gmail.com >> To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] New Directory Layout for Project >> >> Well, not really "core". >> Codes under Analyzer(by DIGY) can be moved to /src/contrib/analyzers (but >> they are not ports from java). >> The others(by M.GARSKI) are extensions to the core(something like >> Lucene.Net.Core.Extensions) >> >> DIGY >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Troy Howard wrote: >> >> > Yeah -- I also changed the Contrib.Net project folder name to >> > ~/src/contrib/core ... >> > >> > IMO we should just roll these into the main library if they are solid, >> > tested and useful.. This is keeping in line with our new philosophy >> > about allowing .NET specific changes, even if it means diverging from >> > Java Lucene to do it. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Troy >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Prescott Nasser >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > Actually what IS contrib.net? It looks like it replaces certain files in >> > Lucene.Net core - are they files better suited to .net? What are they? >> > > >> > > If they are plugins / additional contributions like snowball, etc - why >> > not just break it out and include the appropriate stuff in contrib? Do we >> > need to specify that they are not avaliable in the java version? >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > ---------------------------------------- >> > >> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 22:18:22 +0200 >> > >> From: digyd...@gmail.com >> > >> To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org >> > >> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] New Directory Layout for Project >> > >> >> > >> 0 >> > >> >> > >> ".Net"s seem to be redundant under /src/contrib/ . It could be something >> > >> like >> > >> Analyzers >> > >> Highlighter >> > >> Similarity >> > >> ... >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> (Maybe, we should find a different name for contrib.net. It contains >> > >> "contributions specific to Lucene.Net which are not available in >> > >> Lucene.java) >> > >> >> > >> DIGY >> > >> >> > >> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> > Probably just a miss - but under the src/contrib folder you also have >> > a >> > >> > number of tests in there... >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Also, is it necessary to have all the sub folders? For the most part >> > the >> > >> > stuff in contrib.net is contrib.net - why the secondary folder? >> > Unless >> > >> > that is a requirement of NUnit to have the structure that way it seems >> > a bit >> > >> > cluttered. >> > >> > >> > >> > I would think something like >> > >> > >> > >> > src/contrib/contrib.net/ >> > >> > src/contrib/Snowball.net/ >> > >> > >> > >> > instead of >> > >> > >> > >> > src/contrib/contrib.net/contrib.net/ >> > >> > src/contrib/snowball/snowball.net/ >> > >> > >> > >> > I don't know how people feel about that >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > ~P >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------- >> > >> > > Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 13:31:34 -0500 >> > >> > > From: mhern...@wickedsoftware.net >> > >> > > To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org >> > >> > > CC: thowar...@gmail.com >> > >> > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] New Directory Layout for Project >> > >> > > >> > >> > > +1 >> > >> > > >> > >> > > just a question though. for cmd/bat//sh files for letting people >> > >> > executing >> > >> > > the build or just executing other tools from the command line, would >> > >> > those >> > >> > > have a place in /bin or somewhere els? This is that someone can just >> > >> > export >> > >> > > PATH = / SET PATH= to that one folder and then be able to execute >> > those >> > >> > > commands from one location? >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Troy Howard wrote: >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > All, >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > We'd like to update the project directory structure/layout. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > See below for a proposed layout. I've also uploaded an example >> > which >> > >> > > > you can navigate at: >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~thoward/Lucene.Net/directory-structure-example >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > NOTE: This will not build!! I just put things in the appropriate >> > >> > > > places without updating the solution/project files to show how we >> > >> > > > might lay things out. Also, I included NUnit as an example of a >> > >> > > > third-party dependency that we might include in the repository >> > under >> > >> > > > 'lib'. We of course will *not* be distributing NUnit in this >> > manner, >> > >> > > > due to licensing restrictions. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Ok, disclaimer over... >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Please vote on this layout, or suggest a modification or >> > alternative >> > >> > > > layout. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Voting will be open for 72 hours. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > [ ] +1 Use this directory structure exactly as described, or with >> > a >> > >> > > > minor modification >> > >> > > > [ ] 0 Use a different structure (described in response) >> > >> > > > [ ] -1 Do not change the directory structure at all >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Text description of directory schema: >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Build Files: >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > \build >> > >> > > > \build\VS2008 >> > >> > > > \build\VS2010 >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Source Projects: >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > \src >> > >> > > > \src\contrib >> > >> > > > \src\core >> > >> > > > \src\demo >> > >> > > > \src\contrib\ >> > >> > > > \src\core\ >> > >> > > > \src\demo\ >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Test Projects: >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > \test >> > >> > > > \test\contrib >> > >> > > > \test\core >> > >> > > > \test\demo >> > >> > > > \test\contrib\ >> > >> > > > \test\core\ >> > >> > > > \test\demo\ >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Product Documentation: >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > \doc >> > >> > > > \doc\contrib >> > >> > > > \doc\core >> > >> > > > \doc\demo >> > >> > > > \doc\contrib\ >> > >> > > > \doc\core\ >> > >> > > > \doc\demo\ >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Third-Party Dependencies: >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > \lib >> > >> > > > \lib\ >> > >> > > > \lib\\ >> > >> > > > \lib\\\ >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Binary Builds: >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > \bin >> > >> > > > \bin\contrib >> > >> > > > \bin\core >> > >> > > > \bin\demo >> > >> > > > \bin\contrib\ >> > >> > > > \bin\core\ >> > >> > > > \bin\demo\ >> > >> > > > >> >
