could you give a shout to the list when that gets stabilized? On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Troy Howard <thowar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds good. I'll make a tag prior to starting the directory changes, > but I'll commit changes to trunk. > > Thanks, > Troy > > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:55 AM, digy digy <digyd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1. No pending commits. > > A copy of the current trunk somewhere else(tag, branches etc.) would be > good > > too. > > > > DIGY. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Troy Howard <thowar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Looks like we have a 'lazy consensus', in that, no one has raised any > >> significant objections, a few minor modifications have been suggested > >> (which sound totally reasonable), and those who did vote were > >> positive. > >> > >> Barring any objections, this vote passes. > >> > >> Since DIGY and Scott seem to have gotten the bulk of the work on 2.9.4 > >> finished, I think now is a good time to start the directory layout > >> changes, and it won't be too intrusive to any active commits. I'll > >> start on that this week. > >> > >> If you have any pending commits that would be totally screwed up by > >> this directory change, please finalize those as soon as possible! > >> Otherwise I'll be moving things around and your patches/commits might > >> not be able to find the appropriate files. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Troy > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Prescott Nasser < > geobmx...@hotmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > Any more thoughts on the directory structure? > >> > > >> > Quick Recap: > >> > > >> > We have Troy's original proposal here: > >> > http://people.apache.org/~thoward/Lucene.Net/directory-structure-example/ > >> > > >> > bin/ > >> > build/ (various solution and project files) > >> > vs2008/ > >> > vs2010/ > >> > doc/ > >> > lib/ - third party libraries to make it easy to pull down the source > and > >> go > >> > src/ > >> > contrib/ > >> > core/ > >> > demo/ > >> > test/ > >> > contrib/ > >> > core/ > >> > demo/ > >> > > >> > From here, I further suggested cleaning up the contrib folder - > because > >> we have extra folders: > >> > > >> > src/contrib/contrib.net/contrib.net/ -> src/contrib/contrib.net/ > >> > src/contrib/snowball/snowball.net/ -> src/contrib/Snowball.net/ > >> > > >> > Digy further suggested dropping the .net in all those folders above, > and > >> finding a better name for contrib.net. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > ---------------------------------------- > >> >> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:41:17 +0200 > >> >> From: digyd...@gmail.com > >> >> To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org > >> >> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] New Directory Layout for Project > >> >> > >> >> Well, not really "core". > >> >> Codes under Analyzer(by DIGY) can be moved to /src/contrib/analyzers > >> (but > >> >> they are not ports from java). > >> >> The others(by M.GARSKI) are extensions to the core(something like > >> >> Lucene.Net.Core.Extensions) > >> >> > >> >> DIGY > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Troy Howard wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > Yeah -- I also changed the Contrib.Net project folder name to > >> >> > ~/src/contrib/core ... > >> >> > > >> >> > IMO we should just roll these into the main library if they are > solid, > >> >> > tested and useful.. This is keeping in line with our new philosophy > >> >> > about allowing .NET specific changes, even if it means diverging > from > >> >> > Java Lucene to do it. > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks, > >> >> > Troy > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Prescott Nasser > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Actually what IS contrib.net? It looks like it replaces certain > >> files in > >> >> > Lucene.Net core - are they files better suited to .net? What are > they? > >> >> > > > >> >> > > If they are plugins / additional contributions like snowball, etc > - > >> why > >> >> > not just break it out and include the appropriate stuff in contrib? > Do > >> we > >> >> > need to specify that they are not avaliable in the java version? > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > ---------------------------------------- > >> >> > >> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 22:18:22 +0200 > >> >> > >> From: digyd...@gmail.com > >> >> > >> To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org > >> >> > >> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] New Directory Layout for > Project > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> 0 > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> ".Net"s seem to be redundant under /src/contrib/ . It could be > >> something > >> >> > >> like > >> >> > >> Analyzers > >> >> > >> Highlighter > >> >> > >> Similarity > >> >> > >> ... > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> (Maybe, we should find a different name for contrib.net. It > >> contains > >> >> > >> "contributions specific to Lucene.Net which are not available in > >> >> > >> Lucene.java) > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> DIGY > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote: > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > Probably just a miss - but under the src/contrib folder you > also > >> have > >> >> > a > >> >> > >> > number of tests in there... > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > Also, is it necessary to have all the sub folders? For the > most > >> part > >> >> > the > >> >> > >> > stuff in contrib.net is contrib.net - why the secondary > folder? > >> >> > Unless > >> >> > >> > that is a requirement of NUnit to have the structure that way > it > >> seems > >> >> > a bit > >> >> > >> > cluttered. > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > I would think something like > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > src/contrib/contrib.net/ > >> >> > >> > src/contrib/Snowball.net/ > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > instead of > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > src/contrib/contrib.net/contrib.net/ > >> >> > >> > src/contrib/snowball/snowball.net/ > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > I don't know how people feel about that > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > ~P > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > ---------------------------------------- > >> >> > >> > > Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 13:31:34 -0500 > >> >> > >> > > From: mhern...@wickedsoftware.net > >> >> > >> > > To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org > >> >> > >> > > CC: thowar...@gmail.com > >> >> > >> > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] New Directory Layout for > >> Project > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > +1 > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > just a question though. for cmd/bat//sh files for letting > >> people > >> >> > >> > executing > >> >> > >> > > the build or just executing other tools from the command > line, > >> would > >> >> > >> > those > >> >> > >> > > have a place in /bin or somewhere els? This is that someone > can > >> just > >> >> > >> > export > >> >> > >> > > PATH = / SET PATH= to that one folder and then be able to > >> execute > >> >> > those > >> >> > >> > > commands from one location? > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Troy Howard wrote: > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > All, > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > We'd like to update the project directory > structure/layout. > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > See below for a proposed layout. I've also uploaded an > >> example > >> >> > which > >> >> > >> > > > you can navigate at: > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~thoward/Lucene.Net/directory-structure-example > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > NOTE: This will not build!! I just put things in the > >> appropriate > >> >> > >> > > > places without updating the solution/project files to show > >> how we > >> >> > >> > > > might lay things out. Also, I included NUnit as an example > of > >> a > >> >> > >> > > > third-party dependency that we might include in the > >> repository > >> >> > under > >> >> > >> > > > 'lib'. We of course will *not* be distributing NUnit in > this > >> >> > manner, > >> >> > >> > > > due to licensing restrictions. > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > Ok, disclaimer over... > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > Please vote on this layout, or suggest a modification or > >> >> > alternative > >> >> > >> > > > layout. > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > Voting will be open for 72 hours. > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > [ ] +1 Use this directory structure exactly as described, > or > >> with > >> >> > a > >> >> > >> > > > minor modification > >> >> > >> > > > [ ] 0 Use a different structure (described in response) > >> >> > >> > > > [ ] -1 Do not change the directory structure at all > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > Text description of directory schema: > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > Build Files: > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > \build > >> >> > >> > > > \build\VS2008 > >> >> > >> > > > \build\VS2010 > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > Source Projects: > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > \src > >> >> > >> > > > \src\contrib > >> >> > >> > > > \src\core > >> >> > >> > > > \src\demo > >> >> > >> > > > \src\contrib\ > >> >> > >> > > > \src\core\ > >> >> > >> > > > \src\demo\ > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > Test Projects: > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > \test > >> >> > >> > > > \test\contrib > >> >> > >> > > > \test\core > >> >> > >> > > > \test\demo > >> >> > >> > > > \test\contrib\ > >> >> > >> > > > \test\core\ > >> >> > >> > > > \test\demo\ > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > Product Documentation: > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > \doc > >> >> > >> > > > \doc\contrib > >> >> > >> > > > \doc\core > >> >> > >> > > > \doc\demo > >> >> > >> > > > \doc\contrib\ > >> >> > >> > > > \doc\core\ > >> >> > >> > > > \doc\demo\ > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > Third-Party Dependencies: > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > \lib > >> >> > >> > > > \lib\ > >> >> > >> > > > \lib\\ > >> >> > >> > > > \lib\\\ > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > Binary Builds: > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > \bin > >> >> > >> > > > \bin\contrib > >> >> > >> > > > \bin\core > >> >> > >> > > > \bin\demo > >> >> > >> > > > \bin\contrib\ > >> >> > >> > > > \bin\core\ > >> >> > >> > > > \bin\demo\ > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > >
