David did you use master's smoke tester?

You must use the version on 6.0.x.

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:48 AM, David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I tried to run the smoke tester directly on my machine and it failed right
> after unpacking.  Given other's success, it must be user error.  What might
> the problem be?
>
>   unpack lucene-6.0.1.tgz...
>     verify JAR metadata/identity/no javax.* or java.* classes...
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1412, in <module>
>     main()
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1356, in main
>     smokeTest(c.java, c.url, c.revision, c.version, c.tmp_dir,
> c.is_signed, ' '.join(c.test_args))
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1393, in smokeTest
>     unpackAndVerify(java, 'lucene', tmpDir, artifact, gitRevision,
> version, testArgs, baseURL)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 590, in
> unpackAndVerify
>     verifyUnpacked(java, project, artifact, unpackPath, gitRevision,
> version, testArgs, tmpDir, baseURL)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 712, in verifyUnpacked
>     checkAllJARs(os.getcwd(), project, gitRevision, version, tmpDir,
> baseURL)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 270, in checkAllJARs
>     checkJARMetaData('JAR file "%s"' % fullPath, fullPath, gitRevision,
> version)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 202, in
> checkJARMetaData
>     (desc, verify))
> RuntimeError: JAR file
> "/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.1_c7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf/unpack/lucene-6.0.1/analysis/common/lucene-analyzers-common-6.0.1.jar"
> is missing "X-Compile-Source-JDK: 8" inside its META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
>
> Separately from the smoketest, I've downloaded this RC to use it on a new
> project and haven't found issues yet.
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:19 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for doing the release, Steve. All looks good to me but I think you
>> should get someone to sign you GPG key :)
>>
>> I see this warning while running the tests: GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key
>> is not certified with a trusted signature!
>>
>> Here's my +1!
>>
>> SUCCESS! [1:05:50.755245]
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Michael McCandless <
>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> SUCCESS! [0:31:57.451386]
>>>
>>> Mike McCandless
>>>
>>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a
>>>> couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t
>>>> call the vote, and cut RC2 instead.)
>>>>
>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>>>>
>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>
>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>>>>
>>>> Here’s my +1.
>>>>
>>>> Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
>>>>
>>>> SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Steve
>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
> --
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>

Reply via email to