I plan on cutting the RC later tonight or tomorrow, unless there are objections.
@Noble: Can you comment on the status of SOLR-9310 (on the JIRA) and if it makes sense to hold 5.5.3 ? On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Pushkar Raste <[email protected]> wrote: > Can we also get SOLR-9310 in as well > On Jul 20, 2016 6:28 PM, "Erick Erickson" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I also would like to get SOLR-7280 in, Noble and I just checked it in >> to that branch as well. >> >> Erick >> >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > As Shai mentioned, it is actually about SSL + indexing requests leading >> to >> > unstable state in Solr. >> > >> > How quickly that state is reached is a function of # indexing requests. >> > Thanks for correcting me on that one :-). >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, David Smiley <[email protected] >> > >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for >> those >> >> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise alarm >> >> bells too loudly :-) >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it >> >>> impacts all users with high indexing rates. >> >>> >> >>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else, >> >>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now. >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Anshum Gupta >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker >> >> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: >> >> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Anshum Gupta >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> -- Anshum Gupta
