No, our tests generally don't pass 100% of the times :). The RC is out for vote btw.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 7:08 AM Pushkar Raste <pushkar.ra...@gmail.com> wrote: > Are the tests failing due to patch for SOLR-9310? I think Noble put in fix > yesterday or a day before. > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> > wrote: > >> I've been trying to the RC out since yesterday but our tests are holding >> me back. Once they pass, I'll have the RC out (should be in a few hours). >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 1:37 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Uwe. >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:47 AM Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Anshum, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I will now enable the tests for 5.5 branch on Jenkins! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Uwe >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> >>>> Uwe Schindler >>>> >>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >>>> >>>> http://www.thetaphi.de >>>> >>>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Anshum Gupta [mailto:ans...@anshumgupta.net] >>>> *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2016 7:01 PM >>>> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org >>>> *Subject:* Re: Release Solr 5.5.3 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> With SOLR-9310 out of the door and 6.2.0 out, this is a good time to >>>> resume the 5.5.3 release. Unless any one has any objections, I'll have an >>>> RC out on Wednesday. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -Anshum >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:08 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> UPDATE: I'm just holding back to see if we can have a solution for >>>> SOLR-9310 and have # of upgrades for our users. If we don't have any >>>> clarity by Thursday, I'll start working on the release. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I plan on cutting the RC later tonight or tomorrow, unless there are >>>> objections. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> @Noble: Can you comment on the status of SOLR-9310 (on the JIRA) and if >>>> it makes sense to hold 5.5.3 ? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Pushkar Raste <pushkar.ra...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Can we also get SOLR-9310 in as well >>>> >>>> On Jul 20, 2016 6:28 PM, "Erick Erickson" <erickerick...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I also would like to get SOLR-7280 in, Noble and I just checked it in >>>> to that branch as well. >>>> >>>> Erick >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> > As Shai mentioned, it is actually about SSL + indexing requests >>>> leading to >>>> > unstable state in Solr. >>>> > >>>> > How quickly that state is reached is a function of # indexing >>>> requests. >>>> > Thanks for correcting me on that one :-). >>>> > >>>> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, David Smiley < >>>> david.w.smi...@gmail.com> >>>> > wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for >>>> those >>>> >> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise >>>> alarm >>>> >> bells too loudly :-) >>>> >> >>>> >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net >>>> > >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Hi, >>>> >>> >>>> >>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it >>>> >>> impacts all users with high indexing rates. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it >>>> else, >>>> >>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> -- >>>> >>> Anshum Gupta >>>> >> >>>> >> -- >>>> >> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker >>>> >> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: >>>> >> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Anshum Gupta >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Anshum Gupta >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Anshum Gupta >>>> >>>> >
