Is there anyway to maintain inbound links to confluence pages with the new
system? I'm just thinking about all the user group questions, stackoverflow
Qs, and the like that link to cwiki pages.

Is it possible to setup the right redirects for cwiki pages into the new
system?

Doug
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 7:30 PM Chris Hostetter <hossman_luc...@fucit.org>
wrote:

>
> : First, I'm not about to second-guess this. I wouldn't like to lose the
> : ability to download a full doc to search offline, but it looks like
> : this solution allows that since there is a PDF version after all.
>
> I also like being able to officially "release" the guide, and doing so via
> PDF will still be possible.
>
> But the other nice thing is that this will make it easy to
> maintain "branches" of the ref guide in git, and publish those with
> releases as well -- so you can edit the docs on master, and backport the
> docs to the branch_6x at the same you backport the feature, and we can
> publish HTML versions of the guide right along side the javadoc docs for
> each version of solr.
>
> : As you know, every time I try to edit he CWiki I come whimpering to
> : you or Hoss. Sounds like this solution will reduce the volume of my
> : whimpering which is a good thing. I so loathe Confluence that find
>
> Ideally yes -- a lot of the problems we have with confluence today stem
> from the "WYSI-kind-of-WYG" mentality of it's editor, and the fact that it
> sometimes preserves html styling you can't see until the PDF is published
> (especially when you copy/paste).  Most of that pain should go away
> because the adoc files will be plain text.  (Any markup langauge has it's
> share of "wait, how do i get get formatting XYZ?" but being plain text
> files in git will make it a lot easier to spot mistakes in diffs -- as
> opposed to confluence with it's "heres a historical diff that is also in
> rendered HTML, so good luck noticing that there is an extra span with a
> css class that affects the PDF but isn't mentioned in the web stylesheet"
>
> : I downloaded AsciidocFX and it looks quite usable. There may be better
> : tools out there but that was fast to find and I could work with it. I
> : see a Chrome extension, IntelliJ plugin etc. so it looks like there
> : are a variety of ways to go about all this.
>
> yeah -- just like java IDE/editor choices can be very personal,
> people will also be free to choose any tooling they want for editing
> asciidoc files -- which is another nice win over the web based confluence
> editor.  The trick will be having good automation in place to build the
> HTML & PDF output formats from the source documents, and give helpful
> feedback/errors about any weirdness that we can detect in scripts.  I plan
> on working to help cassandra with the "ongoing automation" when i get back
> from vacation in a few weeks.
>
> (at the moment, I'm spending my last few days before vacation tyring to
> better automate the confluence->(clean)asciidoc conversion so
> cassandra can iterate faster on demos of the full guide)
>
> : > If reaction is positive, my next step will be to expand the demo
> : > online with a full copy of the Ref Guide instead of the current small
> : > set.
>
>
>
> -Hoss
> http://www.lucidworks.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to