Ok; thanks Anshum. On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 1:40 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey David, > > I'm just about to update the website and send out the notification for > 5.5.3 in a few hours (as soon as I get some time at work). About the > section, I assume you are talking about the CHANGES.txt file and I > should've done that as part of the release process but I think I missed the > 5x, and master branches. I've added the 5.5.3 section to both, and moved > your entry to a new 5.5.4 section on the 5x branch. > 5.5.4 section addition on branch_5_5 is a part of the post-release > process, so I'll remember to move this to the correct section when I add > that. > > > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 8:17 AM David Smiley <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Anhum, >> Minutes ago I went and committed >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7417 to master, branch_6x, >> branch_5x, and branch_5_5. While on both the v5 branches, I noticed the >> last 5.5.x was specifically 5.5.2 so I went and added this under a new >> 5.5.3. That is now committed. Then the realization hits me that you're >> doing a 5.5.3 release and it just passed a vote So I guess I should change >> those entries to be 5.5.4 and probably also add a blank 5.5.3 section so >> it's clear there were not additions in 5.5.3 for Lucene? BTW I think this >> bug is "minor" IMO. >> ~ David >> >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:29 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> The release notes (draft) can be found here: >>> >>> Lucene: https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote553 >>> Solr: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote553 >>> >>> Please feel free to edit/fix it. >>> >>> -Anshum >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM David Smiley <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for >>>> those using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise >>>> alarm bells too loudly :-) >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it >>>>> impacts all users with high indexing rates. >>>>> >>>>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else, >>>>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Anshum Gupta >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker >>>> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: >>>> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com >>>> >>> -- >> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker >> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: >> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com >> > -- Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
