I think you're right Simon !
Obviously I didn't test it with that scenario in mind :).
Shai
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Simon Willnauer <
simon.willna...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> hey I wonder how this TEST_MIN_ITER feature works though...
> I expect that if I set -Dtests.iter.min=1 -Dtests.iter=10 and I fail
> in any of those iterations that the the runner stops immediately and
> prints a failure. Is that correct?
>
> if so I don't understand this code:
>
> if (testsFailed) {
> lastIterFailed = i;
> if (i == TEST_ITER_MIN - 1) {
> if (verbose) {
> System.out.println("\nNOTE: iteration " + lastIterFailed + " failed
> !");
> }
> break;
> }
> }
>
> this only stops if it fails at tests.iter.min but not if it has failed
> test.iter.min+1
> This should rather be something like if(i >=TEST_ITERM_MIN-1) right?
>
> simon
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>
