[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15579235#comment-15579235
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-8396:
------------------------------------
bq. the plan is that PointFields will use SortedNumericDocValues instead of
SortedSetDocValues for multi-valued cases. Doing that involves much more work,
since we need to change all the consumers. This patch is already getting large,
so I think it may be better to tackle that in a followup Jira.
Yes; definitely a separate issue... it doesn't seem related to this issue as
this issue is about the index structure (value/range -> docs) not the doc value
(doc -> value).
> Add support for PointFields in Solr
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-8396
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8396
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Attachments: SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch,
> SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch,
> SOLR-8396.patch
>
>
> In LUCENE-6917, [~mikemccand] mentioned that DimensionalValues are better
> than NumericFields in most respects. We should explore the benefits of using
> it in Solr and hence, if appropriate, switch over to using them.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
