[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15580351#comment-15580351
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-8396:
------------------------------------
Phased approach makes sense... I think the first release exposing this feature
should be opt-in. For this release, we could declare them with 'p'. Since
it's been ages since that was a prefix in our schemas (for plain numeric), I
think it's fine. "bkd" is an alternative.
Yes I did read the SortedNumericDocValues vs SortedSetDocValues for
multi-valued... I meant otherwise/in addition to that. I think it should be a
separate issue... and perhaps we should wait on backporting this issue until
both together can be landed on the 6x line to ensure they happen on the same
release -- I get your concern there.
> Add support for PointFields in Solr
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-8396
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8396
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Attachments: SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch,
> SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch,
> SOLR-8396.patch
>
>
> In LUCENE-6917, [~mikemccand] mentioned that DimensionalValues are better
> than NumericFields in most respects. We should explore the benefits of using
> it in Solr and hence, if appropriate, switch over to using them.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
