[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3065:
----------------------------------
Comment: was deleted
(was: Here a first step in cutover of Solr to NumericField. Most tests work,
except:
- TestDistributedSearch, fails with a strange date problem - I have no idea
what goes wrong
- TestMoreLikeThis: fails because the returned documents are different than
expected. The reason for this is simple: As TrieField's underlying Lucene
fields now are NumericField, stringValue() returns something (in contrast,
solr's old fields returned null because they were binary). This confuses maybe
MoreLikeThis (needs maybe fixed in Lucene, I havent looked into the code).
Maybe we should simply exclude those fields or fix the test (I prefer latter
one, because the numerics should also taken into account).
The following changes had to be made:
- Cut over all places in Solr where Field instead of abstract Fieldable is used
to Fieldable. This affects some leftover parts in various components (calling
Document.getField instead of Document.getFieldable), but mainly
SchemaField/FieldType: createField() now returns Fieldable
- TrieDateField code duplication was removed, all methods delegate to a wrapped
TrieField. There was also an inconsitency between TrieField and TrieDateField's
toExternal(). This was fixed to work correct (the date format was wrong, now it
uses dateField.toExternal())
If somebody could help with the rest of the solr stuff and maybe test test
test! Yonik? Ryan? There may be some itches not covered by tests.
Thanks for help from Solr specialists (I am definitely not one, I am more
afraid of the code than I can help)!!!)
> NumericField should be stored in binary format in index (matching Solr's
> format)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3065
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Index
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.2, 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-3065.patch, LUCENE-3065.patch, LUCENE-3065.patch,
> LUCENE-3065.patch, LUCENE-3065.patch, LUCENE-3065.patch, LUCENE-3065.patch
>
>
> (Spinoff of LUCENE-3001)
> Today when writing stored fields we don't record that the field was a
> NumericField, and so at IndexReader time you get back an "ordinary" Field and
> your number has turned into a string. See
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1701?focusedCommentId=12721972&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-12721972
> We have spare bits already in stored fields, so, we should use one to record
> that the field is numeric, and then encode the numeric field in Solr's
> more-compact binary format.
> A nice side-effect is we fix the long standing issue that you don't get a
> NumericField back when loading your document.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
