[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3065:
----------------------------------
Comment: was deleted
(was: Ideally this could be done with the schema-like approach of one of the
GSoC projects?
We already discussed about that: We can use the FieldsReader/FieldsWriter type
flag (which currently says, binary/text and compressed (unused now)) in the
index file format to mark a field as NumericField. In that case,
Document.getField() would return the NumericField instance.
For Lucene backwards we should still support creating "text-only" fields.
The new binary format would also be compatible with solr, as on getField, Solr
would get a NumericField and can decide using instanceof what to do. Old Solr
indexes without the NumericField marker flag would return as byte[], in which
case, solr would do the decoding.
For storing on index side, Solr could move to NumericField completely (I dont
like the current approach using NumericTokenStream and to/fromInternal wrappers
around conventional Field).)
> NumericField should be stored in binary format in index (matching Solr's
> format)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3065
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Index
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.2, 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-3065.patch, LUCENE-3065.patch, LUCENE-3065.patch,
> LUCENE-3065.patch, LUCENE-3065.patch, LUCENE-3065.patch, LUCENE-3065.patch
>
>
> (Spinoff of LUCENE-3001)
> Today when writing stored fields we don't record that the field was a
> NumericField, and so at IndexReader time you get back an "ordinary" Field and
> your number has turned into a string. See
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1701?focusedCommentId=12721972&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-12721972
> We have spare bits already in stored fields, so, we should use one to record
> that the field is numeric, and then encode the numeric field in Solr's
> more-compact binary format.
> A nice side-effect is we fix the long standing issue that you don't get a
> NumericField back when loading your document.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
