On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Smiley, David W. <[email protected]> wrote: > > On May 4, 2011, at 7:14 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote: > >> As a rule, everything should go through JIRA on its way to svn -- this >> is important so that we have somewhere to point for why we did things. >> Even small things. > > Even "small" things?! It would be a royal pain in the ass to submit an issue > for every last stupid typo, reformat, and minor thing. I would also hope > that if a committer authored a chunk of code that he believed, after the > first iteration has already been committed, could use some "minor" tweak that > lets say improves the clarity of the logic or has a better private method > name, that he could just go ahead and commit the minor tweak. I hope that > you guys are not burdened by JIRA for such things! >
Again, I did not mean to make a huge deal out of this -- my reaction to seeing a patch posted as an attachment is "this belongs in JIRA" -- I don't care how trivial it is. If the patch were in the message text, i would feel differently. ryan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
