+1 to early May. We might also want to evaluate the Ver 2 APIs for Solr and default to that if that's ready.
-Anshum On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 4:51 AM Ramkumar R. Aiyengar < [email protected]> wrote: > Should SOLR-8396 be a prerequisite? > > On 25 Jan 2017 10:38, "Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON)" < > [email protected]> wrote: > > +1 for May. > > I'd like to see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8668 in the > 7.0 release (and have tagged/updated the ticket to indicate so). > > Christine > > From: [email protected] At: 01/24/17 17:17:27 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Lucene/Solr 7 > > I would love to see SOLR-5944, SOLR-8029, SOLR-9835 in a 7.0 release. I > think all of these are very close to landing up on master. > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > We have accumulated some good changes in master, like point support in > Solr or sparse norms/doc-values in Lucene. I think it would be nice to > expose these new features to our users, so what would you think about > starting to work on making master ready to be released? > > Since the question about the timeframe will be asked, I think we could > target something like early May 2017, which is a bit more than 3 months > away from now. What do you think? > > Adrien > > >
