+1 for 3.2. Mike
http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Shai Erera <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for 3.2! > > And also, we should adopt that approach going forward (no more bug fix > releases for the stable branch, except for the last release before 4.0 > is out). That means updating the release TODO with e.g., not creating > a branch for 3.2.x, only tag it. When 4.0 is out, we branch 3.x.y out > of the last 3.x tag. > > Shai > > On Saturday, May 14, 2011, Ryan McKinley <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> wrote: >>> It's been just over 1 month since the last release. We've all said we want >>> to get to about a 3 month release cycle (if not more often). I think this >>> means we should start shooting for a next release sometime in June. Which, >>> in my mind, means we should start working on wrapping up issues now, IMO. >>> >>> Here's what's open for 3.2 against: >>> Lucene: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE/fixforversion/12316070 >>> Solr: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR/fixforversion/12316172 >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >> >> +1 for 3.2 with a new feature freeze pretty soon >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
