[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15864098#comment-15864098
]
Tomás Fernández Löbbe commented on SOLR-8396:
---------------------------------------------
Just committed the changes for SOLR-9987.
I’ll now backport the following commits from master
57934ba4480d71218c7f60d0417dbae9d26188d0 SOLR-8396: Add support for PointFields
in Solr
285a1013ad04dd1cd5e5e41ffa93a87fe862c152 SOLR-10011: Refactor PointField &
TrieField to now have a common base class, NumericFieldType
0f7990b2c8590d169add59354cc2678260f94e03 SOLR-10011: Fix exception log message
59c41e2a6c685dd9ac943c69d12e9bfe2a7d380e SOLR-10011: Add NumberType
getNumberType() to FieldType and deprecate LegacyNumericType getNumericType()
7dcf9de41f6435a741910a6367ef9fece11a588b SOLR-9987: Implement support for
multi-valued DocValues in PointFields
I’ll also move the CHANGES entries from from 7 to 6.5
> Add support for PointFields in Solr
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-8396
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8396
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Assignee: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
> Attachments: SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch,
> SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch,
> SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch
>
>
> In LUCENE-6917, [~mikemccand] mentioned that DimensionalValues are better
> than NumericFields in most respects. We should explore the benefits of using
> it in Solr and hence, if appropriate, switch over to using them.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
