[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15856514#comment-15856514
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-8396:
-------------------------------------------------------

Commit 59c41e2a6c685dd9ac943c69d12e9bfe2a7d380e in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/master from Tomas Fernandez Lobbe
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=59c41e2 ]

SOLR-10011: Add NumberType getNumberType() to FieldType and deprecate 
LegacyNumericType getNumericType()

Modify references to getNumericType() to use the new getNumberType(). 
NumberType is shared for the different numeric implementations supported in 
Solr (TrieFields and PointFields).
CC SOLR-8396


> Add support for PointFields in Solr
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-8396
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8396
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>            Assignee: Tomás Fernández Löbbe
>         Attachments: SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch, 
> SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch, 
> SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch
>
>
> In LUCENE-6917, [~mikemccand] mentioned that DimensionalValues are better 
> than NumericFields in most respects. We should explore the benefits of using 
> it in Solr and hence, if appropriate, switch over to using them.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to