[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15888266#comment-15888266
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-10213:
---------------------------------------
+1. Removing pages from the Wiki and/or putting big bold WARNING messages has
been ongoing. Personally I prefer removing all the text and providing a link as
you propose.
And I regularly delete comments if we address the question raised in the text.
> Copy Fields: remove wiki vs. cwiki overlap (and gap)
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10213
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10213
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Wish
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Christine Poerschke
> Priority: Minor
>
> We just stumbled across the 'are copy fields recursive/cascading' question
> again and on https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Copy_Fields found the
> answer which is "no" in the shape of the _The copy is done at the stream
> source level and no copy feeds into another copy._ sentence but
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Copying+Fields didn't seem
> to obviously have that answer although there is a _"... can/does copying
> happen recursively?"_ question hidden in the comments section.
> This ticket here proposes to:
> * fully remove the wiki section content in favour of just a pointer to the
> Solr Reference guide (cwiki)
> * review if anything on the wiki is missing and should be added to the cwiki
> * maybe: tidy up/remove some of the comments on the cwiki (the ones unrelated
> to the cwiki page itself)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
