[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15901736#comment-15901736 ]
Christine Poerschke commented on SOLR-10213: -------------------------------------------- Thanks Erick and Cassandra for your guidance and comments. I have gone and added a small paragraph re: the 'are copy fields recursive/cascading' question to the cwiki page, and have also deleted comments already addressed and/or replied to. > Copy Fields: remove wiki vs. cwiki overlap (and gap) > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-10213 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10213 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Wish > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) > Reporter: Christine Poerschke > Priority: Minor > > We just stumbled across the 'are copy fields recursive/cascading' question > again and on https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Copy_Fields found the > answer which is "no" in the shape of the _The copy is done at the stream > source level and no copy feeds into another copy._ sentence but > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Copying+Fields didn't seem > to obviously have that answer although there is a _"... can/does copying > happen recursively?"_ question hidden in the comments section. > This ticket here proposes to: > * fully remove the wiki section content in favour of just a pointer to the > Solr Reference guide (cwiki) > * review if anything on the wiki is missing and should be added to the cwiki > * maybe: tidy up/remove some of the comments on the cwiki (the ones unrelated > to the cwiki page itself) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org