Well, it was about the implementation of a algorithm that was purposed by a user and was implemented in another way. And this, and not the user mailing list was recommended by this developer to ask this question.
So, not entirely my fault. But I apologize for the inconvenience. I just want to clarify that searching for the tokens separably is not what I want since those words can exist but not all in the same doc. I want to compare the whole phrase. For that to work I not using any Analyzer. As I said, I've got it working, but I don't know how to use the right algorithm for the job. I'm going to redirect my question to the other mailing list. Thanks anyway. On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Earwin Burrfoot <ear...@gmail.com> wrote: > You aren't likely to encounter strings like "abc company inc" in > Lucene index, as it will be tokenized into three tokens "abc", > "company", "inc" under most Analyzers. > So, for this exact example you don't even need fuzzy matching. > > Also, maybe you should try 'user' mailing list for questions regarding > the use of Lucene. > > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 00:54, Guilherme Aiolfi <grad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm re-sending my first message because I've just received the > mailing-list > > confirmation. If it's a duplicated, forget about this one. > > > > Hi, > > I want to do a fuzzy search and always return documents no matter what > the > > score. So, to do this, I'm tried sorting by strdist() in solr 3.1. It > worked > > great and does ALMOST exactly what I wanted. The problem is that the > > algorithms supported jw, ngram and edit are not the best fit for my > > scenario. > > The best results come from StrikeAMatch > > ( > http://www.devarticles.com/c/a/Development-Cycles/How-to-Strike-a-Match/). > > So, I've found this > > link https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2230 that implemented > what > > I wanted. But I was told that I should use trunk because there were some > > really great news about fuzzy search there. > > I read this article explaining some > > changes > http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2011/03/lucenes-fuzzyquery-is-100-times-faster.html > . > > But I still don't think it replaces the StrikeAMatch algo, because that > one > > can have best results in searches like "abc" comparing to strings like > "abc > > company inc" (distance > 2). > > But still, Fuad Efendi told me that StrikeAMatch is toys for kids compare > to > > the state of lucene trunk. So here I'm, I want to know how 4.0 will help > > achieve what I want. > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > -- > Kirill Zakharenko/Кирилл Захаренко > E-Mail/Jabber: ear...@gmail.com > Phone: +7 (495) 683-567-4 > ICQ: 104465785 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
