I'm on 10.10.5 (Yosemite).

It could be related to the platform or just something odd with python 3.6.1



Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:

> FYI I got SUCCESS! [0:36:33.390707] from my reverted-SSL-changes
> smokeTestRelease.py on Python 3.4.2 against the 6.5.1RC2 URL.
> (macOS/Python 3.5.1 reverted smoke tester is still running.)
>
> It may be the case that you’re missing root certificates that I have (on
> both Linux and macOS), and that’s the reason SSL validation is failing for
> you.
>
> What platform are you on?  IIRC some Linux distros have ways of updating
> root certificate stores. (I’ve never had to do that myself though.)
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
> > On Apr 20, 2017, at 1:54 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I just ran the smoke tester and it failed in the part of code that I
> hadn't suppressed the SSL validation. So it's still an issue with my setup.
> >
> > I could try another version of python and see if that is the issue.
> >
> >
> >
> > Joel Bernstein
> > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > AFAICT that error occurs very early in the smoke test process, with the
> first attempt to download the directory listing at the release URL.  I’m
> running the reverted-SSL-changes smokeTestRelease.py on both Python 3.4.2
> (Linux) and 3.5.1 (macOS), and both are way past that.
> >
> > Would you mind trying to run the smoke tester today after reverting your
> SSL changes?  (Maybe it was a temporary problem for some reason.)  AFAICT
> it will fail fast for you.
> >
> > I’m not sure if it makes sense to call the release vote yet, since the
> smoke tester as committed to branch_6_5 doesn’t work for you or for people
> with Python < 3.4.3.  If the problem turns out to be a transient one for
> you, then I think we should revert your SSL changes to smokeTestRelease.py
> on branch_6_5 and respin.
> >
> > --
> > Steve
> > www.lucidworks.com
> >
> > > On Apr 20, 2017, at 1:35 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Here is the error from the smoke test:
> > >
> > > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > >
> > >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1483, in <module>
> > >
> > >     main()
> > >
> > >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1427, in main
> > >
> > >     smokeTest(c.java, c.url, c.revision, c.version, c.tmp_dir,
> c.is_signed, ' '.join(c.test_args))
> > >
> > >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1449, in
> smokeTest
> > >
> > >     for text, subURL in getDirEntries(baseURL):
> > >
> > >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 604, in
> getDirEntries
> > >
> > >     links = getHREFs(urlString)
> > >
> > >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 94, in getHREFs
> > >
> > >     h.request('HEAD', url.path)
> > >
> > >   File 
> > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/http/client.py",
> line 1239, in request
> > >
> > >     self._send_request(method, url, body, headers, encode_chunked)
> > >
> > >   File 
> > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/http/client.py",
> line 1285, in _send_request
> > >
> > >     self.endheaders(body, encode_chunked=encode_chunked)
> > >
> > >   File 
> > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/http/client.py",
> line 1234, in endheaders
> > >
> > >     self._send_output(message_body, encode_chunked=encode_chunked)
> > >
> > >   File 
> > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/http/client.py",
> line 1026, in _send_output
> > >
> > >     self.send(msg)
> > >
> > >   File 
> > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/http/client.py",
> line 964, in send
> > >
> > >     self.connect()
> > >
> > >   File 
> > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/http/client.py",
> line 1400, in connect
> > >
> > >     server_hostname=server_hostname)
> > >
> > >   File 
> > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/ssl.py",
> line 401, in wrap_socket
> > >
> > >     _context=self, _session=session)
> > >
> > >   File 
> > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/ssl.py",
> line 808, in __init__
> > >
> > >     self.do_handshake()
> > >
> > >   File 
> > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/ssl.py",
> line 1061, in do_handshake
> > >
> > >     self._sslobj.do_handshake()
> > >
> > >   File 
> > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/ssl.py",
> line 683, in do_handshake
> > >
> > >     self._sslobj.do_handshake()
> > >
> > > ssl.SSLError: [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify
> failed (_ssl.c:749)
> > >
> > >
> > > Joel Bernstein
> > > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > That’s the error you posted for buildAndPushRelease.py - are you
> saying that you got identical errors for both?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Steve
> > > www.lucidworks.com
> > >
> > > > On Apr 20, 2017, at 1:28 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Python 3.6.1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Joel Bernstein
> > > > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > This was the error:
> > > >
> > > >   File 
> > > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> line 504, in _call_chain
> > > >
> > > >     result = func(*args)
> > > >
> > > >   File 
> > > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> line 1361, in https_open
> > > >
> > > >     context=self._context, check_hostname=self._check_hostname)
> > > >
> > > >   File 
> > > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> line 1320, in do_open
> > > >
> > > >     raise URLError(err)
> > > >
> > > > urllib.error.URLError: <urlopen error [SSL:
> CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed (_ssl.c:749)>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps the error was only local to my machine. But I didn't have
> this error when building RC1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Joel Bernstein
> > > > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > Joel,
> > > >
> > > > I’ve reverted your SSL changes to smokeTestRelease.py, and I don’t
> see any problems so far when I run it with my Python 3.4.2 with the
> 6.5.1RC2 URL.  (Still in progress; Lucene distributions have downloaded so
> far.)
> > > >
> > > > What was the error that caused you to make the SSL changes to
> smokeTestRelease.py?  And what version of Python are you using?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Steve
> > > > www.lucidworks.com
> > > >
> > > > > On Apr 20, 2017, at 1:01 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I have Python 3.4.2 on my Linux box, and apparently 3.4.3 is the
> first that supports the changes you made, so the smoke tester is failing
> for me:
> > > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > >  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 165, in load
> > > > >    content = urllib.request.urlopen(urlString,
> context=ctx).read().decode('utf-8')
> > > > > TypeError: urlopen() got an unexpected keyword argument ‘context’
> > > > > ------
> > > > >
> > > > > I’ll install a newer Python.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Steve
> > > > > www.lucidworks.com
> > > > >
> > > > >> On Apr 20, 2017, at 12:51 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> thanks
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Joel Bernstein
> > > > >> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > >> I’ll take a look.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Steve
> > > > >> www.lucidworks.com
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I've uploaded the RC2 here https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.5.1-RC2-revdfc0dd67f7fe45fbf62d8865295
> 2ec3e2b3e0070/.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> But the smoke test breaks with SSL error in different spot when
> you smoke test from this URL. It's failing with a different command this
> time so the fix I used in other sports of smoke tester doesn't work.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Steve, would you mind taking a look at this and pushing out a
> fix?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Joel Bernstein
> > > > >>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > >>> I was thinking that if buildAndPushRelease.py can identify
> problems early, the RM won’t have to later redo work when a problem is
> found, e.g. by the smoke tester.  IMHO the extra 10 minutes (on my laptop
> anyway) from auto-running precommit would be worth it.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> But I agree that the smoke tester should be heavy, since it’s
> possible that the RM had weird local conditions that weren’t caught by the
> release production tools.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> --
> > > > >>> Steve
> > > > >>> www.lucidworks.com
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 10:23 AM, Joel Bernstein <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> They are both quite long processes. Perhaps we should look at
> eliminating some of the overlap?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Since the smokeTesters is run by those voting on the release
> maybe this should be the heavier of the two.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Joel Bernstein
> > > > >>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > >>>> Also, I think buildAndPushRelease.py should invoke “precommit"
> too, (near) where it runs 'ant clean test'.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> --
> > > > >>>> Steve
> > > > >>>> www.lucidworks.com
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:51 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> That’s bizarre.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> The smoke tester runs ‘ant validate’, which does *not* include
> "documentation-lint” (which includes "-ecj-javadoc-lint”, where unused
> imports are looked for).
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> By contrast, ‘ant precommit’ runs “check-working-copy”,
> “validate”, and “documentation-lint”.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Jenkins caught this not because of the smoke tester, but
> rather because the “nightly-smoke” task it uses runs “-jenkins-base”,
> which, like “precommit”, runs “check-working-copy”, “validate”, and
> “documentation-lint” (among others).
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> I think we should change the smoke tester to look at the same
> things as precommit,
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> --
> > > > >>>>> Steve
> > > > >>>>> www.lucidworks.com
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:29 AM, Joel Bernstein <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Smoke testes passed as well
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > > > >>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>> I guess precommit is only run as part of the smoke tester.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:20 AM, Joel Bernstein <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Interesting the entire release process completed without
> complaining.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > > > >>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Steve Rowe <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>> The unused import was the only problem; I’ve removed it on
> branch_6_5.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Sorry, hope I didn’t cause a delay in the release process.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>>> Steve
> > > > >>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Crap, Jenkins found an unused import in my commit on
> branch_6_5 :(.  I forgot to run precommit.  Doing so now.
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>>>> Steve
> > > > >>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 8:07 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Done.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Steve
> > > > >>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 7:49 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Woohoo!  Thanks Joel.  Running all tests on branch_6_5
> now.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Steve
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 7:20 PM, Joel Bernstein <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I'm OK with restarting RC2. Let me know when you finish
> the back port.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Steve Rowe <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Joel,
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I know you’re in-process with RC2, but if you have to
> restart for some reason, I’d like to include SOLR-10527.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Steve
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 6:57 PM, Joel Bernstein <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I also had to change the smoke tester because of the
> SSL issue. Which in theory means everyone else will have to as well. I'm
> pushing out my changes to branch_6_5, so people can just update their
> branch before running the smoke tester.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Joel Bernstein <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I had to push out three changes to the branch but I
> seemed to have moved passed this issue.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Joel Bernstein <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'll push out the changes and then revert. Hopefully
> the changes will do the trick after they've been pushed.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Steve Rowe <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that is a sucky part of this: you want to make
> modifications on the release branch, but you can’t test unless you commit
> (and push).
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Another alternative: make modifications in another
> checkout, then invoke the script with from an unmodified source tree.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> e.g.:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> cd ..
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> cp -r lucene-solr lucene-solr-2 # assuming lucene-solr
> is your checkout dir
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> # edit lucene-solr-2/dev-tools/
> scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> cd lucene-solr
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> python3 -u 
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> ../lucene-solr-2/dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py
> …
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (a shorter form of that is to make a copy the script
> alone and invoke the modified version from your checkout)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Steve
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 4:32 PM, Joel Bernstein <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ha, that doesn't work either. Now I get this error:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> RuntimeError: There are unpushed commits - "git log
> origin/branch_6_5.." output is:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I'm going to have to push this out.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's first decide if this makes sense as the way
> forward.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Joel Bernstein <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve, when I change the script to turn off
> verification I get the following error:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> RuntimeError: git clone is dirty:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> So as part of the work around I think I'm going to
> have to commit locally and then revert locally. Does that make sense to you
> as the way forward?
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Could it be anything to do with the fact that the
> signer is Semantic
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and they are being actively distrusted by - at least -
> Google:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.securityweek.com/google-stops-trusting-
> symantec-issued-certificates
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ----
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr
> users, new and experienced
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19 April 2017 at 16:22, Joel Bernstein <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I'll turn off the cert verification. I wasn't
> sure if cert verification
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was something that was integral to the process.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Steve Rowe <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Joel,
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure why this is suddenly an issue - I guess
> “SNI”
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/
> wiki/Server_Name_Indication> has been enabled on
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> archive.apache.org?
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some useful info here (about a “requests” lib,
> AFAICT an alternative to
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> urllib):
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://docs.python-requests.
> org/en/master/community/faq/#what-are-hostname-doesn-t-match-errors>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Short term, you could turn off certificate
> verification.  The bottom
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer here uses the same lib as the script (urllib
> instead of urllib2,
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is assumed in the other answers on the page),
> to turn off certificate
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verification:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19268548/python-
> ignore-certicate-validation-urllib2>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 3:43 PM, Joel Bernstein <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that it's failing on verifying the SSL
> cert for
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://archive.apache.org/dist/lucene/java/.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Joel Bernstein <
> [email protected]>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I started working on 6.5.1 RC2. I ran the following:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py
> --push-local
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tmp/releases/6.5.1 --rc-num 2 --sign EE64CB1E
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe this is same basic command I used for
> RC1. But this time I got
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a new error. At first I thought it might be
> incorrect keystore password but
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I changed it and it is correct. Any thoughts what
> the issue is?
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py",
> line 313, in <module>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> main()
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py",
> line 294, in main
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rev = prepare(c.root, c.version, c.key_id,
> c.key_password)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py",
> line 98, in prepare
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checkDOAPfiles(version)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py",
> line 143, in
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checkDOAPfiles
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distpage = load(url)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py",
> line 67, in load
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content = urllib.request.urlopen(
> urlString).read().decode('utf-8')
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.
> framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 223, in urlopen
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return opener.open(url, data, timeout)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.
> framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 526, in open
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response = self._open(req, data)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.
> framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 544, in _open
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> '_open', req)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.
> framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 504, in _call_chain
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> result = func(*args)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.
> framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 1361, in https_open
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context=self._context, check_hostname=self._check_
> hostname)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.
> framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 1320, in do_open
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> raise URLError(err)
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> urllib.error.URLError: <urlopen error [SSL:
> CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED]
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> certificate verify failed (_ssl.c:749)>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [email protected]
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [email protected]
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected].
> org
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [email protected]
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected].
> org
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [email protected]
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected].
> org
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [email protected]
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to