Steve,

It looks like you haven't pushed out you changes yet, reverting my changes.

Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm on 10.10.5 (Yosemite).
>
> It could be related to the platform or just something odd with python 3.6.1
>
>
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> FYI I got SUCCESS! [0:36:33.390707] from my reverted-SSL-changes
>> smokeTestRelease.py on Python 3.4.2 against the 6.5.1RC2 URL.
>> (macOS/Python 3.5.1 reverted smoke tester is still running.)
>>
>> It may be the case that you’re missing root certificates that I have (on
>> both Linux and macOS), and that’s the reason SSL validation is failing for
>> you.
>>
>> What platform are you on?  IIRC some Linux distros have ways of updating
>> root certificate stores. (I’ve never had to do that myself though.)
>>
>> --
>> Steve
>> www.lucidworks.com
>>
>> > On Apr 20, 2017, at 1:54 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > I just ran the smoke tester and it failed in the part of code that I
>> hadn't suppressed the SSL validation. So it's still an issue with my setup.
>> >
>> > I could try another version of python and see if that is the issue.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Joel Bernstein
>> > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > AFAICT that error occurs very early in the smoke test process, with the
>> first attempt to download the directory listing at the release URL.  I’m
>> running the reverted-SSL-changes smokeTestRelease.py on both Python 3.4.2
>> (Linux) and 3.5.1 (macOS), and both are way past that.
>> >
>> > Would you mind trying to run the smoke tester today after reverting
>> your SSL changes?  (Maybe it was a temporary problem for some reason.)
>> AFAICT it will fail fast for you.
>> >
>> > I’m not sure if it makes sense to call the release vote yet, since the
>> smoke tester as committed to branch_6_5 doesn’t work for you or for people
>> with Python < 3.4.3.  If the problem turns out to be a transient one for
>> you, then I think we should revert your SSL changes to smokeTestRelease.py
>> on branch_6_5 and respin.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Steve
>> > www.lucidworks.com
>> >
>> > > On Apr 20, 2017, at 1:35 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Here is the error from the smoke test:
>> > >
>> > > Traceback (most recent call last):
>> > >
>> > >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1483, in
>> <module>
>> > >
>> > >     main()
>> > >
>> > >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1427, in main
>> > >
>> > >     smokeTest(c.java, c.url, c.revision, c.version, c.tmp_dir,
>> c.is_signed, ' '.join(c.test_args))
>> > >
>> > >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1449, in
>> smokeTest
>> > >
>> > >     for text, subURL in getDirEntries(baseURL):
>> > >
>> > >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 604, in
>> getDirEntries
>> > >
>> > >     links = getHREFs(urlString)
>> > >
>> > >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 94, in getHREFs
>> > >
>> > >     h.request('HEAD', url.path)
>> > >
>> > >   File 
>> > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/http/client.py",
>> line 1239, in request
>> > >
>> > >     self._send_request(method, url, body, headers, encode_chunked)
>> > >
>> > >   File 
>> > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/http/client.py",
>> line 1285, in _send_request
>> > >
>> > >     self.endheaders(body, encode_chunked=encode_chunked)
>> > >
>> > >   File 
>> > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/http/client.py",
>> line 1234, in endheaders
>> > >
>> > >     self._send_output(message_body, encode_chunked=encode_chunked)
>> > >
>> > >   File 
>> > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/http/client.py",
>> line 1026, in _send_output
>> > >
>> > >     self.send(msg)
>> > >
>> > >   File 
>> > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/http/client.py",
>> line 964, in send
>> > >
>> > >     self.connect()
>> > >
>> > >   File 
>> > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/http/client.py",
>> line 1400, in connect
>> > >
>> > >     server_hostname=server_hostname)
>> > >
>> > >   File 
>> > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/ssl.py",
>> line 401, in wrap_socket
>> > >
>> > >     _context=self, _session=session)
>> > >
>> > >   File 
>> > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/ssl.py",
>> line 808, in __init__
>> > >
>> > >     self.do_handshake()
>> > >
>> > >   File 
>> > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/ssl.py",
>> line 1061, in do_handshake
>> > >
>> > >     self._sslobj.do_handshake()
>> > >
>> > >   File 
>> > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/ssl.py",
>> line 683, in do_handshake
>> > >
>> > >     self._sslobj.do_handshake()
>> > >
>> > > ssl.SSLError: [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify
>> failed (_ssl.c:749)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Joel Bernstein
>> > > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > That’s the error you posted for buildAndPushRelease.py - are you
>> saying that you got identical errors for both?
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Steve
>> > > www.lucidworks.com
>> > >
>> > > > On Apr 20, 2017, at 1:28 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Python 3.6.1
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Joel Bernstein
>> > > > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > > This was the error:
>> > > >
>> > > >   File 
>> > > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
>> line 504, in _call_chain
>> > > >
>> > > >     result = func(*args)
>> > > >
>> > > >   File 
>> > > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
>> line 1361, in https_open
>> > > >
>> > > >     context=self._context, check_hostname=self._check_hostname)
>> > > >
>> > > >   File 
>> > > > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
>> line 1320, in do_open
>> > > >
>> > > >     raise URLError(err)
>> > > >
>> > > > urllib.error.URLError: <urlopen error [SSL:
>> CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed (_ssl.c:749)>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Perhaps the error was only local to my machine. But I didn't have
>> this error when building RC1
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Joel Bernstein
>> > > > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > > Joel,
>> > > >
>> > > > I’ve reverted your SSL changes to smokeTestRelease.py, and I don’t
>> see any problems so far when I run it with my Python 3.4.2 with the
>> 6.5.1RC2 URL.  (Still in progress; Lucene distributions have downloaded so
>> far.)
>> > > >
>> > > > What was the error that caused you to make the SSL changes to
>> smokeTestRelease.py?  And what version of Python are you using?
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Steve
>> > > > www.lucidworks.com
>> > > >
>> > > > > On Apr 20, 2017, at 1:01 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I have Python 3.4.2 on my Linux box, and apparently 3.4.3 is the
>> first that supports the changes you made, so the smoke tester is failing
>> for me:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > -----
>> > > > >  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 165, in load
>> > > > >    content = urllib.request.urlopen(urlString,
>> context=ctx).read().decode('utf-8')
>> > > > > TypeError: urlopen() got an unexpected keyword argument ‘context’
>> > > > > ------
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I’ll install a newer Python.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Steve
>> > > > > www.lucidworks.com
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> On Apr 20, 2017, at 12:51 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> thanks
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Joel Bernstein
>> > > > >> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > > >> I’ll take a look.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> --
>> > > > >> Steve
>> > > > >> www.lucidworks.com
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Joel Bernstein <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> I've uploaded the RC2 here https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>> dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.5.1-RC2-revdfc0dd67f7fe45fbf62
>> d88652952ec3e2b3e0070/.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> But the smoke test breaks with SSL error in different spot when
>> you smoke test from this URL. It's failing with a different command this
>> time so the fix I used in other sports of smoke tester doesn't work.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Steve, would you mind taking a look at this and pushing out a
>> fix?
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Joel Bernstein
>> > > > >>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > > >>> I was thinking that if buildAndPushRelease.py can identify
>> problems early, the RM won’t have to later redo work when a problem is
>> found, e.g. by the smoke tester.  IMHO the extra 10 minutes (on my laptop
>> anyway) from auto-running precommit would be worth it.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> But I agree that the smoke tester should be heavy, since it’s
>> possible that the RM had weird local conditions that weren’t caught by the
>> release production tools.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> --
>> > > > >>> Steve
>> > > > >>> www.lucidworks.com
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 10:23 AM, Joel Bernstein <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> They are both quite long processes. Perhaps we should look at
>> eliminating some of the overlap?
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> Since the smokeTesters is run by those voting on the release
>> maybe this should be the heavier of the two.
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> Joel Bernstein
>> > > > >>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>> Also, I think buildAndPushRelease.py should invoke “precommit"
>> too, (near) where it runs 'ant clean test'.
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> --
>> > > > >>>> Steve
>> > > > >>>> www.lucidworks.com
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:51 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> That’s bizarre.
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> The smoke tester runs ‘ant validate’, which does *not*
>> include "documentation-lint” (which includes "-ecj-javadoc-lint”, where
>> unused imports are looked for).
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> By contrast, ‘ant precommit’ runs “check-working-copy”,
>> “validate”, and “documentation-lint”.
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> Jenkins caught this not because of the smoke tester, but
>> rather because the “nightly-smoke” task it uses runs “-jenkins-base”,
>> which, like “precommit”, runs “check-working-copy”, “validate”, and
>> “documentation-lint” (among others).
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> I think we should change the smoke tester to look at the same
>> things as precommit,
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> --
>> > > > >>>>> Steve
>> > > > >>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:29 AM, Joel Bernstein <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> Smoke testes passed as well
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>> > > > >>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Steve Rowe <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>> I guess precommit is only run as part of the smoke tester.
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:20 AM, Joel Bernstein <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Interesting the entire release process completed without
>> complaining.
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>> > > > >>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Steve Rowe <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>> The unused import was the only problem; I’ve removed it on
>> branch_6_5.
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Sorry, hope I didn’t cause a delay in the release process.
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> --
>> > > > >>>>>>> Steve
>> > > > >>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> Crap, Jenkins found an unused import in my commit on
>> branch_6_5 :(.  I forgot to run precommit.  Doing so now.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> --
>> > > > >>>>>>>> Steve
>> > > > >>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 8:07 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Done.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> --
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Steve
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 7:49 PM, Steve Rowe <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Woohoo!  Thanks Joel.  Running all tests on branch_6_5
>> now.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> --
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Steve
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 7:20 PM, Joel Bernstein <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I'm OK with restarting RC2. Let me know when you finish
>> the back port.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Steve Rowe <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Joel,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I know you’re in-process with RC2, but if you have to
>> restart for some reason, I’d like to include SOLR-10527.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Steve
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 6:57 PM, Joel Bernstein <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I also had to change the smoke tester because of the
>> SSL issue. Which in theory means everyone else will have to as well. I'm
>> pushing out my changes to branch_6_5, so people can just update their
>> branch before running the smoke tester.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Joel Bernstein <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I had to push out three changes to the branch but
>> I seemed to have moved passed this issue.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Joel Bernstein <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'll push out the changes and then revert. Hopefully
>> the changes will do the trick after they've been pushed.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Steve Rowe <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that is a sucky part of this: you want to make
>> modifications on the release branch, but you can’t test unless you commit
>> (and push).
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Another alternative: make modifications in another
>> checkout, then invoke the script with from an unmodified source tree.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> e.g.:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> cd ..
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> cp -r lucene-solr lucene-solr-2 # assuming lucene-solr
>> is your checkout dir
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> # edit lucene-solr-2/dev-tools/script
>> s/buildAndPushRelease.py
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> cd lucene-solr
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> python3 -u 
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> ../lucene-solr-2/dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py
>> …
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (a shorter form of that is to make a copy the script
>> alone and invoke the modified version from your checkout)
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Steve
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 4:32 PM, Joel Bernstein <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ha, that doesn't work either. Now I get this error:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> RuntimeError: There are unpushed commits - "git log
>> origin/branch_6_5.." output is:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I'm going to have to push this out.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's first decide if this makes sense as the way
>> forward.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Joel Bernstein <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve, when I change the script to turn off
>> verification I get the following error:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> RuntimeError: git clone is dirty:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> So as part of the work around I think I'm going to
>> have to commit locally and then revert locally. Does that make sense to you
>> as the way forward?
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Alexandre
>> Rafalovitch <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Could it be anything to do with the fact that the
>> signer is Semantic
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and they are being actively distrusted by - at least
>> - Google:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.securityweek.com/go
>> ogle-stops-trusting-symantec-issued-certificates
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ----
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr
>> users, new and experienced
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19 April 2017 at 16:22, Joel Bernstein <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I'll turn off the cert verification. I wasn't
>> sure if cert verification
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was something that was integral to the process.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Steve Rowe <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Joel,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure why this is suddenly an issue - I guess
>> “SNI”
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
>> /Server_Name_Indication> has been enabled on
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> archive.apache.org?
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some useful info here (about a “requests” lib,
>> AFAICT an alternative to
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> urllib):
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://docs.python-requests.o
>> rg/en/master/community/faq/#what-are-hostname-doesn-t-match-errors>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Short term, you could turn off certificate
>> verification.  The bottom
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer here uses the same lib as the script (urllib
>> instead of urllib2,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is assumed in the other answers on the page),
>> to turn off certificate
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verification:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://stackoverflow.com/ques
>> tions/19268548/python-ignore-certicate-validation-urllib2>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 3:43 PM, Joel Bernstein <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that it's failing on verifying the SSL
>> cert for
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://archive.apache.org/dist/lucene/java/.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Joel Bernstein <
>> [email protected]>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I started working on 6.5.1 RC2. I ran the
>> following:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py
>> --push-local
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tmp/releases/6.5.1 --rc-num 2 --sign EE64CB1E
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe this is same basic command I used for
>> RC1. But this time I got
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a new error. At first I thought it might be
>> incorrect keystore password but
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I changed it and it is correct. Any thoughts what
>> the issue is?
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py",
>> line 313, in <module>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> main()
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py",
>> line 294, in main
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rev = prepare(c.root, c.version, c.key_id,
>> c.key_password)
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py",
>> line 98, in prepare
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checkDOAPfiles(version)
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py",
>> line 143, in
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checkDOAPfiles
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distpage = load(url)
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py",
>> line 67, in load
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content = urllib.request.urlopen(urlStri
>> ng).read().decode('utf-8')
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.fr
>> amework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 223, in urlopen
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return opener.open(url, data, timeout)
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.fr
>> amework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 526, in open
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response = self._open(req, data)
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.fr
>> amework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 544, in _open
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> '_open', req)
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.fr
>> amework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 504, in _call_chain
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> result = func(*args)
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.fr
>> amework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 1361, in https_open
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context=self._context,
>> check_hostname=self._check_hostname)
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.fr
>> amework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 1320, in do_open
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> raise URLError(err)
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> urllib.error.URLError: <urlopen error [SSL:
>> CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED]
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> certificate verify failed (_ssl.c:749)>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>> ---------------------------------------
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> [email protected]
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [email protected]
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>> ---------------------------------------
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> [email protected]
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [email protected]
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>> ---------------------------------------
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected].
>> org
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [email protected]
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>> ---------------------------------------
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected].
>> org
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [email protected]
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> ------------------------------
>> ---------------------------------------
>> > > > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > > > >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------
>> > > > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > > > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------
>> > > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------
>> > > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------
>> > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------
>> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to