And sure start the vote whenever you're ready. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it's still RC2. > > Joel Bernstein > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 4:58 PM, jim ferenczi <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Thanks Joel ! I can also start the vote when the release candidate is >> ready if you want. >> Is it still an RC2 or should I name it RC3 ? >> >> 2017-04-20 22:52 GMT+02:00 Joel Bernstein <[email protected]>: >> >>> Ok Jim, it's all yours. Thanks for stepping in. I'll delete RC2 from svn >>> when it finishes uploading. >>> >>> Joel Bernstein >>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 4:46 PM, jim ferenczi <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I can do it Joel. As Mike said, this is a bad bug that can lead to data >>>> lost... >>>> >>>> 2017-04-20 22:43 GMT+02:00 Joel Bernstein <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> I'm just uploading RC2 now. We can respin, but I won't be available >>>>> for a respin this evening or tomorrow. If someone else wants to step in >>>>> thats ok. >>>>> >>>>> Joel Bernstein >>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Michael McCandless < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Joel, >>>>>> >>>>>> LUCENE-7791 is actually quite a bad bug, and the patch looks low risk >>>>>> and committable; maybe we should merge it for 6.5.1? >>>>>> >>>>>> Mike McCandless >>>>>> >>>>>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Joel, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I’ve created <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7793> >>>>>>> and <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7794> to add >>>>>>> precommit checking (or the equivalent) to buildAndPushRelease.py and >>>>>>> smokeTestRelease.py, respectively. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Steve >>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > On Apr 20, 2017, at 10:29 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > I was thinking that if buildAndPushRelease.py can identify >>>>>>> problems early, the RM won’t have to later redo work when a problem is >>>>>>> found, e.g. by the smoke tester. IMHO the extra 10 minutes (on my >>>>>>> laptop >>>>>>> anyway) from auto-running precommit would be worth it. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > But I agree that the smoke tester should be heavy, since it’s >>>>>>> possible that the RM had weird local conditions that weren’t caught by >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> release production tools. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > -- >>>>>>> > Steve >>>>>>> > www.lucidworks.com >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >> On Apr 20, 2017, at 10:23 AM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> They are both quite long processes. Perhaps we should look at >>>>>>> eliminating some of the overlap? >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Since the smokeTesters is run by those voting on the release >>>>>>> maybe this should be the heavier of the two. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Joel Bernstein >>>>>>> >> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >> Also, I think buildAndPushRelease.py should invoke “precommit" >>>>>>> too, (near) where it runs 'ant clean test'. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> -- >>>>>>> >> Steve >>>>>>> >> www.lucidworks.com >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:51 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> That’s bizarre. >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> The smoke tester runs ‘ant validate’, which does *not* include >>>>>>> "documentation-lint” (which includes "-ecj-javadoc-lint”, where unused >>>>>>> imports are looked for). >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> By contrast, ‘ant precommit’ runs “check-working-copy”, >>>>>>> “validate”, and “documentation-lint”. >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> Jenkins caught this not because of the smoke tester, but rather >>>>>>> because the “nightly-smoke” task it uses runs “-jenkins-base”, which, >>>>>>> like >>>>>>> “precommit”, runs “check-working-copy”, “validate”, and >>>>>>> “documentation-lint” (among others). >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> I think we should change the smoke tester to look at the same >>>>>>> things as precommit, >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> -- >>>>>>> >>> Steve >>>>>>> >>> www.lucidworks.com >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:29 AM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> Smoke testes passed as well >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> Joel Bernstein >>>>>>> >>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>> I guess precommit is only run as part of the smoke tester. >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:20 AM, Joel Bernstein < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> Interesting the entire release process completed without >>>>>>> complaining. >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> Joel Bernstein >>>>>>> >>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>> The unused import was the only problem; I’ve removed it on >>>>>>> branch_6_5. >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> Sorry, hope I didn’t cause a delay in the release process. >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>> Steve >>>>>>> >>>>> www.lucidworks.com >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Crap, Jenkins found an unused import in my commit on >>>>>>> branch_6_5 :(. I forgot to run precommit. Doing so now. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>> Steve >>>>>>> >>>>>> www.lucidworks.com >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 8:07 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Done. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Steve >>>>>>> >>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 7:49 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Woohoo! Thanks Joel. Running all tests on branch_6_5 now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Steve >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 7:20 PM, Joel Bernstein < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm OK with restarting RC2. Let me know when you finish >>>>>>> the back port. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Steve Rowe < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Joel, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I know you’re in-process with RC2, but if you have to >>>>>>> restart for some reason, I’d like to include SOLR-10527. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Steve >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 6:57 PM, Joel Bernstein < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I also had to change the smoke tester because of the SSL >>>>>>> issue. Which in theory means everyone else will have to as well. I'm >>>>>>> pushing out my changes to branch_6_5, so people can just update their >>>>>>> branch before running the smoke tester. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Joel Bernstein < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ok, I had to push out three changes to the branch but I >>>>>>> seemed to have moved passed this issue. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Joel Bernstein < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'll push out the changes and then revert. Hopefully the >>>>>>> changes will do the trick after they've been pushed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Steve Rowe < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that is a sucky part of this: you want to make >>>>>>> modifications on the release branch, but you can’t test unless you >>>>>>> commit >>>>>>> (and push). >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Another alternative: make modifications in another >>>>>>> checkout, then invoke the script with from an unmodified source tree. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> e.g.: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> cd .. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> cp -r lucene-solr lucene-solr-2 # assuming lucene-solr is >>>>>>> your checkout dir >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> # edit lucene-solr-2/dev-tools/script >>>>>>> s/buildAndPushRelease.py >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> cd lucene-solr >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> python3 -u >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ../lucene-solr-2/dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py >>>>>>> … >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> (a shorter form of that is to make a copy the script >>>>>>> alone and invoke the modified version from your checkout) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Steve >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 4:32 PM, Joel Bernstein < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ha, that doesn't work either. Now I get this error: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> RuntimeError: There are unpushed commits - "git log >>>>>>> origin/branch_6_5.." output is: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So, I'm going to have to push this out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Let's first decide if this makes sense as the way >>>>>>> forward. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Joel Bernstein < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Steve, when I change the script to turn off verification >>>>>>> I get the following error: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> RuntimeError: git clone is dirty: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So as part of the work around I think I'm going to have >>>>>>> to commit locally and then revert locally. Does that make sense to you >>>>>>> as >>>>>>> the way forward? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Could it be anything to do with the fact that the signer >>>>>>> is Semantic >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> and they are being actively distrusted by - at least - >>>>>>> Google: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.securityweek.com/go >>>>>>> ogle-stops-trusting-symantec-issued-certificates >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Alex. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ---- >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, >>>>>>> new and experienced >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 19 April 2017 at 16:22, Joel Bernstein < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I'll turn off the cert verification. I wasn't sure >>>>>>> if cert verification >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> was something that was integral to the process. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Steve Rowe < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Joel, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure why this is suddenly an issue - I guess “SNI” >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication> >>>>>>> has been enabled on >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> archive.apache.org? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Some useful info here (about a “requests” lib, AFAICT >>>>>>> an alternative to >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> urllib): >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://docs.python-requests.o >>>>>>> rg/en/master/community/faq/#what-are-hostname-doesn-t-match-errors> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Short term, you could turn off certificate >>>>>>> verification. The bottom >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> answer here uses the same lib as the script (urllib >>>>>>> instead of urllib2, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> which is assumed in the other answers on the page), to >>>>>>> turn off certificate >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> verification: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://stackoverflow.com/ques >>>>>>> tions/19268548/python-ignore-certicate-validation-urllib2> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 3:43 PM, Joel Bernstein < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that it's failing on verifying the SSL >>>>>>> cert for >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://archive.apache.org/dist/lucene/java/. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Joel Bernstein < >>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I started working on 6.5.1 RC2. I ran the following: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py >>>>>>> --push-local >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tmp/releases/6.5.1 --rc-num 2 --sign EE64CB1E >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe this is same basic command I used for RC1. >>>>>>> But this time I got >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a new error. At first I thought it might be incorrect >>>>>>> keystore password but >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I changed it and it is correct. Any thoughts what the >>>>>>> issue is? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last): >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", >>>>>>> line 313, in <module> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> main() >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", >>>>>>> line 294, in main >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rev = prepare(c.root, c.version, c.key_id, >>>>>>> c.key_password) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", >>>>>>> line 98, in prepare >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> checkDOAPfiles(version) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", >>>>>>> line 143, in >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> checkDOAPfiles >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> distpage = load(url) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", >>>>>>> line 67, in load >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> content = urllib.request.urlopen(urlStri >>>>>>> ng).read().decode('utf-8') >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> File >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.fr >>>>>>> amework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py", >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 223, in urlopen >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> return opener.open(url, data, timeout) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> File >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.fr >>>>>>> amework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py", >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 526, in open >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> response = self._open(req, data) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> File >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.fr >>>>>>> amework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py", >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 544, in _open >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> '_open', req) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> File >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.fr >>>>>>> amework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py", >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 504, in _call_chain >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> result = func(*args) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> File >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.fr >>>>>>> amework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py", >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 1361, in https_open >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> context=self._context, check_hostname=self._check_hos >>>>>>> tname) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> File >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.fr >>>>>>> amework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py", >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 1320, in do_open >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> raise URLError(err) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> urllib.error.URLError: <urlopen error [SSL: >>>>>>> CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> certificate verify failed (_ssl.c:749)> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>> --------------------------------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]. >>>>>>> org >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>> --------------------------------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]. >>>>>>> org >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>> --------------------------------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>> --------------------------------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> --------- >>>>>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> --------- >>>>>>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> --------- >>>>>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> --------- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
