Thanks Joel ! I can also start the vote when the release candidate is ready
if you want.
Is it still an RC2 or should I name it RC3 ?

2017-04-20 22:52 GMT+02:00 Joel Bernstein <[email protected]>:

> Ok Jim, it's all yours. Thanks for stepping in. I'll delete RC2 from svn
> when it finishes uploading.
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 4:46 PM, jim ferenczi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I can do it Joel. As Mike said, this is a bad bug that can lead to data
>> lost...
>>
>> 2017-04-20 22:43 GMT+02:00 Joel Bernstein <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> I'm just uploading RC2 now. We can respin, but I won't be available for
>>> a respin this evening or tomorrow. If someone else wants to step in thats
>>> ok.
>>>
>>> Joel Bernstein
>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Michael McCandless <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Joel,
>>>>
>>>> LUCENE-7791 is actually quite a bad bug, and the patch looks low risk
>>>> and committable; maybe we should merge it for 6.5.1?
>>>>
>>>> Mike McCandless
>>>>
>>>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Joel,
>>>>>
>>>>> I’ve created <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7793> and <
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7794> to add precommit
>>>>> checking (or the equivalent) to buildAndPushRelease.py and
>>>>> smokeTestRelease.py, respectively.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Steve
>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>>
>>>>> > On Apr 20, 2017, at 10:29 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I was thinking that if buildAndPushRelease.py can identify problems
>>>>> early, the RM won’t have to later redo work when a problem is found, e.g.
>>>>> by the smoke tester.  IMHO the extra 10 minutes (on my laptop anyway) from
>>>>> auto-running precommit would be worth it.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > But I agree that the smoke tester should be heavy, since it’s
>>>>> possible that the RM had weird local conditions that weren’t caught by the
>>>>> release production tools.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > Steve
>>>>> > www.lucidworks.com
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> On Apr 20, 2017, at 10:23 AM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> They are both quite long processes. Perhaps we should look at
>>>>> eliminating some of the overlap?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Since the smokeTesters is run by those voting on the release maybe
>>>>> this should be the heavier of the two.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Joel Bernstein
>>>>> >> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >> Also, I think buildAndPushRelease.py should invoke “precommit" too,
>>>>> (near) where it runs 'ant clean test'.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> --
>>>>> >> Steve
>>>>> >> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:51 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> That’s bizarre.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> The smoke tester runs ‘ant validate’, which does *not* include
>>>>> "documentation-lint” (which includes "-ecj-javadoc-lint”, where unused
>>>>> imports are looked for).
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> By contrast, ‘ant precommit’ runs “check-working-copy”,
>>>>> “validate”, and “documentation-lint”.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> Jenkins caught this not because of the smoke tester, but rather
>>>>> because the “nightly-smoke” task it uses runs “-jenkins-base”, which, like
>>>>> “precommit”, runs “check-working-copy”, “validate”, and
>>>>> “documentation-lint” (among others).
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> I think we should change the smoke tester to look at the same
>>>>> things as precommit,
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> --
>>>>> >>> Steve
>>>>> >>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:29 AM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> Smoke testes passed as well
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> Joel Bernstein
>>>>> >>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>> I guess precommit is only run as part of the smoke tester.
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:20 AM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> Interesting the entire release process completed without
>>>>> complaining.
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> Joel Bernstein
>>>>> >>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>> The unused import was the only problem; I’ve removed it on
>>>>> branch_6_5.
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> Sorry, hope I didn’t cause a delay in the release process.
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> --
>>>>> >>>>> Steve
>>>>> >>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>> Crap, Jenkins found an unused import in my commit on branch_6_5
>>>>> :(.  I forgot to run precommit.  Doing so now.
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>> --
>>>>> >>>>>> Steve
>>>>> >>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 8:07 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>> Done.
>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>> --
>>>>> >>>>>>> Steve
>>>>> >>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 7:49 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>> Woohoo!  Thanks Joel.  Running all tests on branch_6_5 now.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>> --
>>>>> >>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>> >>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 7:20 PM, Joel Bernstein <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm OK with restarting RC2. Let me know when you finish the
>>>>> back port.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Steve Rowe <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Joel,
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I know you’re in-process with RC2, but if you have to
>>>>> restart for some reason, I’d like to include SOLR-10527.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> --
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 6:57 PM, Joel Bernstein <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I also had to change the smoke tester because of the SSL
>>>>> issue. Which in theory means everyone else will have to as well. I'm
>>>>> pushing out my changes to branch_6_5, so people can just update their
>>>>> branch before running the smoke tester.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Joel Bernstein <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ok, I had to push out three changes to the branch but I
>>>>> seemed to have moved passed this issue.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Joel Bernstein <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'll push out the changes and then revert. Hopefully the
>>>>> changes will do the trick after they've been pushed.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Steve Rowe <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that is a sucky part of this: you want to make
>>>>> modifications on the release branch, but you can’t test unless you commit
>>>>> (and push).
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Another alternative: make modifications in another
>>>>> checkout, then invoke the script with from an unmodified source tree.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> e.g.:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> cd ..
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> cp -r lucene-solr lucene-solr-2 # assuming lucene-solr is
>>>>> your checkout dir
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> # edit lucene-solr-2/dev-tools/script
>>>>> s/buildAndPushRelease.py
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> cd lucene-solr
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> python3 -u 
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ../lucene-solr-2/dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py
>>>>> …
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> (a shorter form of that is to make a copy the script alone
>>>>> and invoke the modified version from your checkout)
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 4:32 PM, Joel Bernstein <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ha, that doesn't work either. Now I get this error:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> RuntimeError: There are unpushed commits - "git log
>>>>> origin/branch_6_5.." output is:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So, I'm going to have to push this out.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Let's first decide if this makes sense as the way forward.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Joel Bernstein <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Steve, when I change the script to turn off verification I
>>>>> get the following error:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> RuntimeError: git clone is dirty:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So as part of the work around I think I'm going to have to
>>>>> commit locally and then revert locally. Does that make sense to you as the
>>>>> way forward?
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Could it be anything to do with the fact that the signer
>>>>> is Semantic
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> and they are being actively distrusted by - at least -
>>>>> Google:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.securityweek.com/go
>>>>> ogle-stops-trusting-symantec-issued-certificates
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Alex.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ----
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users,
>>>>> new and experienced
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 19 April 2017 at 16:22, Joel Bernstein <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I'll turn off the cert verification. I wasn't sure if
>>>>> cert verification
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> was something that was integral to the process.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Steve Rowe <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Joel,
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure why this is suddenly an issue - I guess “SNI”
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication>
>>>>> has been enabled on
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> archive.apache.org?
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Some useful info here (about a “requests” lib, AFAICT an
>>>>> alternative to
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> urllib):
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://docs.python-requests.o
>>>>> rg/en/master/community/faq/#what-are-hostname-doesn-t-match-errors>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Short term, you could turn off certificate
>>>>> verification.  The bottom
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> answer here uses the same lib as the script (urllib
>>>>> instead of urllib2,
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> which is assumed in the other answers on the page), to
>>>>> turn off certificate
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> verification:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://stackoverflow.com/ques
>>>>> tions/19268548/python-ignore-certicate-validation-urllib2>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 3:43 PM, Joel Bernstein <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that it's failing on verifying the SSL cert
>>>>> for
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://archive.apache.org/dist/lucene/java/.
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Joel Bernstein <
>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I started working on 6.5.1 RC2. I ran the following:
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py
>>>>> --push-local
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tmp/releases/6.5.1 --rc-num 2 --sign EE64CB1E
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe this is same basic command I used for RC1.
>>>>> But this time I got
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a new error. At first I thought it might be incorrect
>>>>> keystore password but
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I changed it and it is correct. Any thoughts what the
>>>>> issue is?
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line
>>>>> 313, in <module>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> main()
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line
>>>>> 294, in main
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rev = prepare(c.root, c.version, c.key_id,
>>>>> c.key_password)
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line
>>>>> 98, in prepare
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> checkDOAPfiles(version)
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line
>>>>> 143, in
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> checkDOAPfiles
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> distpage = load(url)
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line
>>>>> 67, in load
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> content = urllib.request.urlopen(urlStri
>>>>> ng).read().decode('utf-8')
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.fr
>>>>> amework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 223, in urlopen
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> return opener.open(url, data, timeout)
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.fr
>>>>> amework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 526, in open
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> response = self._open(req, data)
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.fr
>>>>> amework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 544, in _open
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> '_open', req)
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.fr
>>>>> amework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 504, in _call_chain
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> result = func(*args)
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.fr
>>>>> amework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 1361, in https_open
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> context=self._context, check_hostname=self._check_hos
>>>>> tname)
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.fr
>>>>> amework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 1320, in do_open
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> raise URLError(err)
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> urllib.error.URLError: <urlopen error [SSL:
>>>>> CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED]
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> certificate verify failed (_ssl.c:749)>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected].
>>>>> org
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ---------
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ---------
>>>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ---------
>>>>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ---------
>>>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to