Sure Martijn, please go ahead. Thanks.

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Martijn v Groningen <
martijn.v.gronin...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ishan,
>
> I like to backport LUCENE-7810 to the 6.6 branch. Is that okay with you?
>
> Martijn
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:02 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Adrien! +1 for the LUCENE-7847 merge.
>>
>> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ishan,
>>>
>>> I closed LUCENE-7573 which is actually not a problem. We thought it
>>> would be buggy or at least trappy given another bug that was discovered but
>>> the merge logic actually uses the doc-values API in a way that there should
>>> not be problems.
>>>
>>> I took the opportunity of the respin to merge https://issues.apache.org/
>>> jira/browse/LUCENE-7847 to 6.6, hopefully that's ok with you. I can
>>> still revert if that does not work for you or if you already started
>>> building the RC.
>>>
>>> Le lun. 22 mai 2017 à 22:35, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> * I see that LUCENE-7573 is an outstanding blocker for 6.6, but it
>>>> doesn't have a patch and nor has it been updated since March.
>>>> * I see no other issues marked as a blocker. Can someone aware of the
>>>> issues discussed above please mark them as a blocker if they absolutely
>>>> need to go into 6.6?
>>>>
>>>> If there is no update about LUCENE-7573 or any other blockers (apart
>>>> from LUCENE-7573) in another 24 hours from now, I'm planning to downgrade
>>>> LUCENE-7573 from Blocker to Major and start building the next RC. Please
>>>> let me know if there are any objections.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 to respin, and have fixes to LUCENE-7833 included.
>>>>> Uwe, I guess the V2 standalone mode issue is SOLR-10711. Do you
>>>>> consider it as a blocker? If so, can we mark it as such on the JIRA? Is
>>>>> there an issue for the Windows space issue?
>>>>> As for SOLR-10004, I don't think it is a release blocker; however a
>>>>> nice one to fix before the re-spin, if possible. I'd be glad to 
>>>>> reconsider,
>>>>> if someone thinks otherwise.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/
>>>>> LONDON) <cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The "javadocs want to fail" output sounds like
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10004 ticket.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 05/17/17 18:44:36
>>>>>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The smoke tester ended with:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SUCCESS! [0:59:34.797969]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, after looking at some of its output, I see a:
>>>>>>    ***WARNING***: javadocs want to fail!
>>>>>> Which followed many "missing: ..." messages akin to this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   unpack solr-6.6.0-src.tgz...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     make sure no JARs/WARs in src dist...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     run "ant validate documentation-lint"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     run tests w/ Java 8 and testArgs=''...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     generate javadocs w/ Java 8...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /tmp/smoke_lucene_6.6.0_4d055f00bba9a745737e4b6c3f9dff
>>>>>> 06dd35aa2e/unpack/solr-6.6.0/solr/build/docs/solr-
>>>>>> analytics/org/apache/solr/analytics/expression/package-summary.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   missing: ExpressionFactory
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /tmp/smoke_lucene_6.6.0_4d055f00bba9a745737e4b6c3f9dff
>>>>>> 06dd35aa2e/unpack/solr-6.6.0/solr/build/docs/solr-
>>>>>> analytics/org/apache/solr/analytics/plugin/package-summary.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   missing: AnalyticsStatisticsCollector
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:49 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>>>>> is...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 6.6.0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.6.0-RC1-
>>>>>>> rev4d055f00bba9a745737e4b6c3f9dff06dd35aa2e
>>>>>>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.5.0-RC1-rev4b16c9a10c3c00cafaf1fc92ec3276a7bc7b8c95>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.6.0-RC1-
>>>>>>> rev4d055f00bba9a745737e4b6c3f9dff06dd35aa2e
>>>>>>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.5.0-RC1-rev4b16c9a10c3c00cafaf1fc92ec3276a7bc7b8c95>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's my +1
>>>>>>> SUCCESS! [0:32:20.501484]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: http://www.
>>>>>> solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>

Reply via email to