This seems fixed now. I'm starting RC5 build now (I have already published RC4, but this issue came in before I could start the voting thread for RC4). Please let me know if someone has any objections.
Thanks! On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < [email protected]> wrote: > Even irrespective of its impact to SOLR-8440, this issue (SOLR-10718) > itself looks a pretty bad one. > Seems like no one would've been able to use basicAuth in 6.5 through > changes to solr.in.sh! > I'll take a look. I'll hold the RC for at most another day, until this is > fixed. > > > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Should SOLR-10718 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10718> be >> a blocker for 6.6 since it renders the new feature in SOLR-8440 >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8440> somewhat broken? >> >> -- >> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com >> >> 26. mai 2017 kl. 23.53 skrev Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >> [email protected]>: >> >> Sure, Steve. Please go ahead. It seems there will be a re-spin to include >> SOLR-10735 fix. >> >> I'll also take the opportunity to dig into SOLR-10004 a bit more. Apart >> from the unconventional placement of @lucene.experimental tags that I did >> there, I want to understand why those descriptions still didn't make it to >> the javadocs (and hence continued to print a "missing" warning). >> >> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 12:24 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Ishan, >>> >>> If there is a respin, I’d like to include SOLR-10758 (updates Chinese >>> analysis in the Solr ref guide, and includes a Lucene test addition in the >>> analysis/icu module). >>> >>> -- >>> Steve >>> www.lucidworks.com >>> >>> > On May 26, 2017, at 12:45 PM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > Not sure if half of Windows users have spaces in their home directory. >>> If someone marks SOLR-10735 as a blocker and/or provides a fix, I'll be >>> happy to re-spin. >>> > >>> > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 9:55 PM, Tomas Fernandez Lobbe < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> > I didn’t try this myself yet (just got a Windows machine to try it), >>> but looking at Uwe’s comment here[1], I think this should be a blocker, >>> half Windows users won’t be able to run the example. >>> > >>> > >>> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10735?focusedComm >>> entId=16026393&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issueta >>> bpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16026393 >>> > >>> >> On May 26, 2017, at 8:34 AM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Uwe, do you think this is a blocker? >>> >> >>> >> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> on my computer, the Solr one still does not start -see the whitespace >>> in directory name (my user name): >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> C:\Users\Uwe Schindler\Desktop\solr-6.6.0\bin>solr.cmd start -e >>> techproducts >>> >> >>> >> Creating Solr home directory C:\Users\Uwe >>> Schindler\Desktop\solr-6.6.0\example\techproducts\solr >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Starting up Solr on port 8983 using command: >>> >> >>> >> C:\Users\Uwe Schindler\Desktop\solr-6.6.0\bin\solr.cmd start -p 8983 >>> -s "C:\Users\Uwe Schindler\Desktop\solr-6.6.0\example\techproducts\solr" >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> ERROR: Failed to start Solr using command: C:\Users\Uwe >>> Schindler\Desktop\solr-6.6.0\bin\solr.cmd start -p 8983 -s >>> "C:\Users\Uwe Schindler\Desktop\solr-6.6.0\example\techproducts\solr" >>> Exception : org.apache.commons.exec.ExecuteException: Execution failed >>> (Exit value: -559038737. Caused by java.io.IOException: Cannot run program >>> "C:\Users\Uwe" (in directory "."): CreateProcess error=193, %1 ist keine >>> zulässige Win32-Anwendung) >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> C:\Users\Uwe Schindler\Desktop\solr-6.6.0\bin> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> I will post this to the issue. Starting Solr without example works, >>> but you then have no core to quickly do tests. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> FYI, I added a Linux and Windows build of branch_6_6 to Policeman >>> Jenkins a minute ago. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Uwe >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> ----- >>> >> >>> >> Uwe Schindler >>> >> >>> >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >>> >> >>> >> http://www.thetaphi.de >>> >> >>> >> eMail: [email protected] >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> From: Ishan Chattopadhyaya [mailto:[email protected]] >>> >> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 9:43 AM >>> >> To: [email protected] >>> >> Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 RC3 >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 >>> >> >>> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6. >>> 6.0-RC3-revbfb1ee42b2edbc2f2dea49b9d0e3201069d6e781 >>> >> >>> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >>> >> >>> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6. >>> 6.0-RC3-revbfb1ee42b2edbc2f2dea49b9d0e3201069d6e781 >>> >> >>> >> Here's my +1 >>> >> SUCCESS! [1:16:00.055493] >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >> >
