I just discovered SOLR-11221, which basically breaks JMX monitoring. We could either release with “known issues” and then quickly do 7.0.1, or wait until it’s fixed.
> On 10 Aug 2017, at 18:55, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'll generate a test report for the 7.0 branch tonight so we can evaluate > that for an rc as well. > > - Mark > > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:32 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net > <mailto:ans...@anshumgupta.net>> wrote: > Good news! > > I don't see any 'blockers' for 7.0 anymore, which means, after giving Jenkins > a couple of days, I'll cut out an RC. I intend to do this on > Wednesday/Thursday, unless a blocker comes up, which I hope shouldn't be the > case. > > Anshum > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:02 PM Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com > <mailto:sar...@gmail.com>> wrote: > I worked through the list of issues with the "numeric-tries-to-points” label > and marked those as 7.0 Blocker that seemed reasonable, on the assumption > that we should at a minimum give clear error messages for points > non-compatibility. > > If others don’t agree with the Blocker assessments I’ve made, I’m willing to > discuss on the issues. > > I plan on starting to work on the remaining 7.0 blockers now. I would > welcome assistance in clearing them up. > > Here’s a JIRA query to see just the remaining 7.0 blockers, of which there > are currently 12: > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+in+(SOLR,LUCENE)+AND+fixVersion=7.0+AND+priority=Blocker+AND+resolution=Unresolved > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+in+(SOLR,LUCENE)+AND+fixVersion=7.0+AND+priority=Blocker+AND+resolution=Unresolved>> > > -- > Steve > www.lucidworks.com <http://www.lucidworks.com/> > > > On Jul 25, 2017, at 2:41 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net > > <mailto:ans...@anshumgupta.net>> wrote: > > > > I will *try* to get to it, but can't confirm. If someone else has a spare > > cycle and can take it up before I get to it, please do. > > > > -Anshum > > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:44 AM Cassandra Targett <casstarg...@gmail.com > > <mailto:casstarg...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I believe the only remaining blocker to SOLR-10803 (to mark all Trie* > > fields as deprecated) is SOLR-11023, which Hoss was working on. As he > > noted last night, he is off for vacation for the next 2 weeks. Is > > anyone else available to work on it so 7.0 isn't stalled for 2+ more > > weeks? > > > > Now would also be a good time to look over any other bugs with > > PointFields and make a case if any should be considered blockers for > > 7.0. I think they all share a label: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20numeric-tries-to-points > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20numeric-tries-to-points> > > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Chris Hostetter > > <hossman_luc...@fucit.org <mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org>> wrote: > > > > > > : So, my overall point is that if A) we agree that we want to deprecate > > > : Trie* numeric fields, and B) we want to hold up the 7.0 release until > > > : that's done, it's more than just updating the example schemas if we > > > : want to ensure a quality app for users. We still need to fix the tests > > > : and also fix bugs that are going to be really painful for users. And > > > : to get all that done soon, we definitely need some more volunteers. > > > > > > I've beefed up the description of SOLR-10807 with tips on how people can > > > help out... > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10807 > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10807> > > > > > > > > > > > > -Hoss > > > http://www.lucidworks.com/ <http://www.lucidworks.com/> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > > <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > <mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org> > > -- > - Mark > about.me/markrmiller <http://about.me/markrmiller>
