Thanks for the report Mark! and yes, I'll wait until the JMX issue is fixed.
Anshum On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:49 AM Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, let's not release a major version with JMX monitoring broken. > > Here is a 30 run test report for the 7.0 branch: > http://apache-solr-7-0.bitballoon.com/20170811 > > - Mark > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:02 PM Tomas Fernandez Lobbe <tflo...@apple.com> > wrote: > >> Lets fix it before releasing. I’d hate to release with a known critical >> bug. >> >> On Aug 10, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Ab, >> >> How quickly are we talking about? If you suggest, we could wait, >> depending upon the impact, and the time required to fix it. >> >> Anshum >> >> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:28 PM Andrzej Białecki < >> andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> wrote: >> >>> I just discovered SOLR-11221, which basically breaks JMX monitoring. We >>> could either release with “known issues” and then quickly do 7.0.1, or wait >>> until it’s fixed. >>> >>> On 10 Aug 2017, at 18:55, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I'll generate a test report for the 7.0 branch tonight so we can >>> evaluate that for an rc as well. >>> >>> - Mark >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:32 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Good news! >>>> >>>> I don't see any 'blockers' for 7.0 anymore, which means, after giving >>>> Jenkins a couple of days, I'll cut out an RC. I intend to do this on >>>> Wednesday/Thursday, unless a blocker comes up, which I hope shouldn't be >>>> the case. >>>> >>>> Anshum >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:02 PM Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I worked through the list of issues with the "numeric-tries-to-points” >>>>> label and marked those as 7.0 Blocker that seemed reasonable, on the >>>>> assumption that we should at a minimum give clear error messages for >>>>> points >>>>> non-compatibility. >>>>> >>>>> If others don’t agree with the Blocker assessments I’ve made, I’m >>>>> willing to discuss on the issues. >>>>> >>>>> I plan on starting to work on the remaining 7.0 blockers now. I would >>>>> welcome assistance in clearing them up. >>>>> >>>>> Here’s a JIRA query to see just the remaining 7.0 blockers, of which >>>>> there are currently 12: >>>>> >>>>> < >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+in+(SOLR,LUCENE)+AND+fixVersion=7.0+AND+priority=Blocker+AND+resolution=Unresolved >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Steve >>>>> www.lucidworks.com >>>>> >>>>> > On Jul 25, 2017, at 2:41 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > I will *try* to get to it, but can't confirm. If someone else has a >>>>> spare cycle and can take it up before I get to it, please do. >>>>> > >>>>> > -Anshum >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:44 AM Cassandra Targett < >>>>> casstarg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> > I believe the only remaining blocker to SOLR-10803 (to mark all Trie* >>>>> > fields as deprecated) is SOLR-11023, which Hoss was working on. As he >>>>> > noted last night, he is off for vacation for the next 2 weeks. Is >>>>> > anyone else available to work on it so 7.0 isn't stalled for 2+ more >>>>> > weeks? >>>>> > >>>>> > Now would also be a good time to look over any other bugs with >>>>> > PointFields and make a case if any should be considered blockers for >>>>> > 7.0. I think they all share a label: >>>>> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20numeric-tries-to-points >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Chris Hostetter >>>>> > <hossman_luc...@fucit.org> wrote: >>>>> > > >>>>> > > : So, my overall point is that if A) we agree that we want to >>>>> deprecate >>>>> > > : Trie* numeric fields, and B) we want to hold up the 7.0 release >>>>> until >>>>> > > : that's done, it's more than just updating the example schemas if >>>>> we >>>>> > > : want to ensure a quality app for users. We still need to fix the >>>>> tests >>>>> > > : and also fix bugs that are going to be really painful for users. >>>>> And >>>>> > > : to get all that done soon, we definitely need some more >>>>> volunteers. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > I've beefed up the description of SOLR-10807 with tips on how >>>>> people can >>>>> > > help out... >>>>> > > >>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10807 >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > -Hoss >>>>> > > http://www.lucidworks.com/ >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> > > >>>>> > >>>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> -- >>> - Mark >>> about.me/markrmiller >>> >>> >>> >> -- > - Mark > about.me/markrmiller >
