Uwe: As far as I'm concerned, please do put both in. Varun is the RM and has final say of course. He may be traveling though and be a little delayed responding.
Erick On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 5:41 AM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > > I just noticed, that our Hadoop friends released Hadoop 2.7.4. This fixes > the stupid Java 9 bug in their static initializer (StringIndexOutOfBounds). > So I’d like to also get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11261 > in. If Jenkins is happy on 7.x and master, this should be easy. > > > > If you think it’s too risky (Hadoop 2.7.2 -> 2.7.4), we can live with the > workaround in Lucene 6.6.1! But the workaround is really hacky: It changes > the “java.version” system property temporarily on Java 9 while initializing > Hadoop, which is not something you should ever do! > > > > Uwe > > > > ----- > > Uwe Schindler > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > http://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: [email protected] > > > > *From:* Uwe Schindler [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Sunday, August 20, 2017 12:53 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: Release a 6.6.1 > > > > Hi, > > > > I need to backport SOLR-10966 to branch 6.6, otherwise Jenkins does not > pass with Java 9. > > > > Uwe > > > > ----- > > Uwe Schindler > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > http://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: [email protected] > > > > *From:* Uwe Schindler [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] > *Sent:* Saturday, August 19, 2017 12:00 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: Release a 6.6.1 > > > > Hi, > > I enabled Jenkins jobs on 👮. ASF was active already. > > Uwe > > Am 18. August 2017 23:34:23 MESZ schrieb Varun Thacker <[email protected] > >: > > From the bug fixes in lucene 7.0 do we need to backport any of these > issues : LUCENE-7859 / LUCENE-7871 / LUCENE-7914 ? > > > > I plan on backporting these three Solr fixes on Sunday > > > > SOLR-10698 > > SOLR-10719 > > SOLR-11228 > > > > looking through the 7.0 bug fixes these two look important to get in as > well : > > > > SOLR-10983 > > SOLR-9262 > > > > So if no one get's to it I'll try backporting them as well > > > > Can someone please enable Jenkins on the branch again? > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Erick Erickson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Right, that was the original note before we decided to backport a > bunch of other stuff and I decided it made no sense to omit this one. > All that has to happen is remove the " (note, not in 7.0, is in 7.1)" > bits since it's in 6.6, 6.x, 7.0, 7.1 and master. > > Good catch! > > > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Varun Thacker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Should I then go remove the note part from the CHANGES entry in > branch_6_6 ? > > > > * SOLR-11177: CoreContainer.load needs to send lazily loaded core > > descriptors to the proper list rather than send > > them all to the transient lists. (Erick Erickson) (note, not in 7.0, > is in > > 7.1) > > > > I see a commit for this in branch_7_0 > > > > Commit c73b5429b722b09b9353ec82627a35e2b864b823 in lucene-solr's branch > > refs/heads/branch_7_0 from Erick > > [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=c73b542 ] > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Erick Erickson <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > >> > >> Well, it is in 7.0. Everything I moved to 6.6.1 is also in 7.0, or > should > >> be. > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Varun Thacker <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > Hi Erick, > >> > > >> > I was going through the CHANGES file from the 6_6 branch and just > >> > curious > >> > why are we not planning on putting SOLR-11177 in 7.0 ? > >> > > >> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Erick Erickson > >> > <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> OK, I'm done with my changes for 7.0, I think Varun might have a few > >> >> too. > >> >> > >> >> And things didn't melt down overnight so... > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Anshum Gupta < > [email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > +1 on getting the fixes into 7.0 if you are confident with those, > and > >> >> > if > >> >> > they are a part of 6.6.1. > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks for taking care of this Erick. > >> >> > > >> >> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:24 PM Erick Erickson > >> >> > <[email protected]> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> FYI: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I'll be backporting the following to SOLR 7.0 today: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> SOLR-11024: ParallelStream should set the StreamContext when > >> >> >> constructing SolrStreams: > >> >> >> SOLR-11177: CoreContainer.load needs to send lazily loaded core > >> >> >> descriptors to the proper list rather than send them all to the > >> >> >> transient lists. > >> >> >> SOLR-11122: Creating a core should write a core.properties file > >> >> >> first > >> >> >> and clean up on failure > >> >> >> > >> >> >> and those as well as several others to 6.6.1. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Since some of these depend on others, I need to add them in a > >> >> >> specific > >> >> >> order. I intend to run minimal tests for each JIRA before pushing, > >> >> >> then when they are all in place go through the full test cycle, > >> >> >> precommit and all that. I doubt that other than the flurry of > commit > >> >> >> messages anyone will notice, at least if this stuff is as safe to > >> >> >> backport as I believe people _better_ not. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> If these cause any serious problems for the 7.0 code line, feel > free > >> >> >> to back them out any time after today. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Why am I bothering the 7.0 code line? well, it's awkward to have a > >> >> >> fix > >> >> >> in 6.6.1, skip 7.0 and have it show up again in 7.1. We can live > >> >> >> with > >> >> >> some thing not being in 7.0 if any of this causes disruptions > >> >> >> though. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Erick > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Erik Hatcher > >> >> >> <[email protected]> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > Yes, I’m confident in that patch and its safety, thanks Varun! > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Erik > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > On Aug 16, 2017, at 2:22 PM, Varun Thacker <[email protected]> > >> >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > @Erik -If you are confident with the patch and if you think it's > >> >> >> > safe > >> >> >> > then > >> >> >> > please go ahead and commit it. I'll try having a look at it > >> >> >> > tomorrow > >> >> >> > as > >> >> >> > well. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > I will start back-porting issues which I am comfortable with. If > >> >> >> > others > >> >> >> > can > >> >> >> > chime in as well it will be great. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > I'll aim to cut an RC on Monday 21st August evening PST time so > >> >> >> > everyone > >> >> >> > get's time to get the fixes in. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Any objections in the approach? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 4:56 AM, Erik Hatcher > >> >> >> > <[email protected]> > >> >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> I’d like to get https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/browse/SOLR-10874 > >> >> >> >> in > >> >> >> >> soon > >> >> >> >> as well. Varun, if you’d like to take this one over that’d be > >> >> >> >> fine > >> >> >> >> by > >> >> >> >> me > >> >> >> >> too ;) otherwise prod me back channel and I’ll get to it. > >> >> >> >> Ideally I > >> >> >> >> should > >> >> >> >> have applied this one ages ago for 7.0, so maybe it can make it > >> >> >> >> in > >> >> >> >> time > >> >> >> >> for > >> >> >> >> 6.6.1 and 7.0. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Erik > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> On Aug 14, 2017, at 5:51 PM, Varun Thacker <[email protected]> > >> >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> From the change log of 6.7 / 7.0 and 7.1 the total count of bug > >> >> >> >> fixes > >> >> >> >> under lucene and solr are > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Lucene : 7 > >> >> >> >> Solr : 61 > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> I'd be happy to volunteer as a release manager for a bug fix > >> >> >> >> 6.6.1 > >> >> >> >> release > >> >> >> >> if others in the community think it's a good idea > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ > --------- > >> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ > --------- > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > -- > Uwe Schindler > Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen > https://www.thetaphi.de >
