> - SOLR-10586 (janhoy) > - SOLR-10587 (janhoy) Both of these are only committed to 6.x branch, while the related SOLR-10584 and SOLR-10585 were committed to 7.x. This is correct.
-- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > 23. aug. 2017 kl. 08.15 skrev Anshum Gupta <ansh...@apple.com>: > > I also found more issues when comparing 7x, with 6x this time. I’ll take a > look at wether it’s just the CHANGES entries or have these actually missed > the branch. I assume it’s just the CHANGES, but want to be sure. If the > committers involved can pitch in, I’d appreciate, else I’ll work on this for > a bit right now and continue with this tomorrow morning. > > - SOLR-10477 (Ab) > - SOLR-10631: Metric reporters leak on 6x. (Ab) > - SOLR-10718: Shawn Feldman, Hrishikesh Gadre, janhoy, Jason Gerlowski via > Ishan Chattopadhyaya) > - SOLR-10586 (janhoy) > - SOLR-10587 (janhoy) > - SOLR-10000 (Ab) > > I don’t think we’re missing any commits after this as I’ve now compared both > 6x with 7.0, and master with 7.0. > > -Anshum > > > >> On Aug 22, 2017, at 10:50 PM, Anshum Gupta <ansh...@apple.com >> <mailto:ansh...@apple.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I’m sanitizing the CHANGES.txt in branch_7_0, before cutting the RC. Here >> are a couple of conflicting CHANGES.txt entries: >> >> - SOLR-11128: Entry in 'Other changes' on branch_7_0 , but in 'Other >> changes' on master (Varun, Ishan) >> - SOLR-10821: Mention in master (7.0 section) but not in branch_7_0 (Noble, >> Cassandra, Shalin) >> >> I am going to add the entry for SOLR-10821 on branch_7_0, and move the entry >> to the bug fix section on master for SOLR-11228. >> >> If the committers involved here think that isn’t apt, let me know or feel >> free to fix it. >> >> Getting the RC generally takes a few tries, and I’m also helping Varun with >> the RC build for 6.6.1, so all of you would have more than a few hours for >> this :). >> >> -Anshum >> >> >> >
