> I think it's important Lucene keeps good performance on "ordinary" > machines/envs.
Not that this voice will help in anything, but I think the above is virtually impossible to achieve unless you have a bunch of machines, OSs and VMs to continually test on and a consistent set of benchmarks plotted over time... and of course check every single commit for regression over all these combinations. And even then you'd always find a case of something being faster or slower on some combination of hardware/ software; optimizing for these differences makes little sense to me (people struggling with performance on some weird software/hardware combination can always change the VM vendor or a VM switch). Sorry for being so pessimistically unconstructive... :( Dawid --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
