Hi Anshum,

I am in the process of uploading artifacts that passed precommit locally.
Your changes seem to be only about the reference guide, which I think is
built separately? I think that means that I could proceed with the current
artifacts that I have, let you push your commit, and then we will just need
to make sure that your commit is included when we build a release candidate
of the ref guide?

Hopefully Cassandra can confirm some of my assumptions.

Le lun. 18 juin 2018 à 18:53, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> a
écrit :

> Hi Adrien,
>
> Is it ok for my to commit the documentation patch for SOLR-11277?
>
> Anshum
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 2:24 AM Alan Woodward <romseyg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> LUCENE-8360 is committed.
>>
>>
>> On 18 Jun 2018, at 08:38, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The fix looks good to me, let's get it in before building the first RC?
>>
>> Le dim. 17 juin 2018 à 22:39, Alan Woodward <romseyg...@gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> I’m still debugging RandomChains failures, and found
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8360.  I don’t think it’s
>>> a Blocker though, and there will probably be more odd corners that
>>> ConditionalTokenFilter has exposed which can wait for 7.4.1  or a respin.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 15 Jun 2018, at 11:04, Simon Willnauer <simon.willna...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> this issue is fixed
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Simon Willnauer
>>> <simon.willna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> our CI found a failure, I opened a blocker and attached a patch:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8358
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Simon Willnauer
>>> <simon.willna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 for a first RC
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> It looks like blockers are all resolved, please let me know if I am
>>> missing
>>> something. I will build a first RC on Monday.
>>>
>>> Le jeu. 14 juin 2018 à 15:02, Alan Woodward <romseyg...@gmail.com> a
>>> écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>> LUCENE-8357 is in.
>>>
>>> On 14 Jun 2018, at 09:27, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Le jeu. 14 juin 2018 à 10:02, Alan Woodward <romseyg...@gmail.com> a
>>> écrit
>>> :
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Adrien,
>>>
>>> If possible I’d like to get LUCENE-8357 in, which fixes a regression in
>>> Explanations for Solr’s boost queries.
>>>
>>> Alan
>>>
>>>
>>> On 13 Jun 2018, at 20:42, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> It is. In general I trust your judgement to only backport low-risk fixes.
>>>
>>> Le mer. 13 juin 2018 à 21:03, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>> Crap, I forgot to ask for inclusion of SOLR-12481, a doc-only fix
>>> related to SOLR-12434.  I’m going to assume that it’s okay to backport as
>>> well, I’ll go do that now.  Sorry for the churn.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Steve
>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>
>>> On Jun 13, 2018, at 1:49 PM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks, done.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Steve
>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>
>>> On Jun 13, 2018, at 1:08 PM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> OK to backport SOLR-12434.
>>>
>>> Le mer. 13 juin 2018 à 18:41, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>> Adrien,
>>>
>>> Are you okay with backporting SOLR-12434 to 7.4?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Steve
>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>
>>> On Jun 12, 2018, at 9:37 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Done, thanks Adrien.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Steve
>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>
>>> On Jun 12, 2018, at 9:23 AM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 to backport LUCENE-8278 to 7.4. Thanks Steve.
>>>
>>> Le lun. 11 juin 2018 à 23:21, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> a écrit
>>> :
>>> Adrien,
>>>
>>> Are you okay with including the fix on LUCENE-8278 in 7.4?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Steve
>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>
>>> On Jun 11, 2018, at 11:24 AM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> No worries Uwe, we'll wait. Enjoy Buzzwords!
>>>
>>> Le lun. 11 juin 2018 à 17:08, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> a
>>> écrit :
>>> I still have this new security issue and to fix it finally
>>> everywhere, it requires API changes. So please wait, I am working but
>>> buzzwords is so interesting! 🤯
>>>
>>> Uwe
>>>
>>>
>>> Am June 11, 2018 2:45:54 PM UTC schrieb David Smiley
>>> <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>:
>>> It'd be nice to get in this bug
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8344 but is pending a
>>> review.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 4:24 AM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> We released 7.3 two months ago on April 4th and we accumulated
>>> quite a number of features, enhancements and fixes that are not released
>>> yet, so I'd like to start working on releasing Lucene/Solr 7.4.0.
>>>
>>> I propose to create the 7.4 branch later this week and build the
>>> first RC early next week if that works for everyone. Please let me know
>>> if
>>> that are bug fixes that we think should make it to 7.4 and might not be
>>> ready by then.
>>>
>>> Adrien
>>> --
>>> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author,
>>> Speaker
>>> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
>>> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>>>
>>> --
>>> Uwe Schindler
>>> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Achterdiek+19,+28357+Bremen&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>> https://www.thetaphi.de
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> <dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org>
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>> <dev-h...@lucene.apache.org>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

Reply via email to