Github user dsmiley commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/410#discussion_r198150106
  
    --- Diff: 
solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/update/TestNestedUpdateProcessor.java ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
    + * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
    + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
    + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
    + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
    + * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.solr.update;
    +
    +import java.util.ArrayList;
    +import java.util.List;
    +
    +import org.apache.solr.SolrTestCaseJ4;
    +import org.apache.solr.common.SolrException;
    +import org.apache.solr.common.util.ContentStream;
    +import org.apache.solr.common.util.ContentStreamBase;
    +import org.apache.solr.request.SolrQueryRequest;
    +import org.apache.solr.request.SolrRequestInfo;
    +import org.apache.solr.response.SolrQueryResponse;
    +import org.apache.solr.schema.IndexSchema;
    +import org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrRequestParsers;
    +import org.junit.Before;
    +import org.junit.BeforeClass;
    +import org.junit.Rule;
    +import org.junit.Test;
    +import org.junit.rules.ExpectedException;
    +
    +import static 
org.apache.solr.update.processor.NestedUpdateProcessor.splitChar;
    --- End diff --
    
    After Yonik gave some sage advice on this topic once, I now think tests 
ought not to refer to constants in the tested code.  This way in the future if 
we change our minds on what those constants refer to, we're then realizing we 
may break back-compat.


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to