Github user moshebla commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/410#discussion_r199399224
--- Diff:
solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/update/TestNestedUpdateProcessor.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,189 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.solr.update;
+
+import java.util.ArrayList;
+import java.util.List;
+
+import org.apache.solr.SolrTestCaseJ4;
+import org.apache.solr.common.SolrException;
+import org.apache.solr.common.util.ContentStream;
+import org.apache.solr.common.util.ContentStreamBase;
+import org.apache.solr.request.SolrQueryRequest;
+import org.apache.solr.request.SolrRequestInfo;
+import org.apache.solr.response.SolrQueryResponse;
+import org.apache.solr.schema.IndexSchema;
+import org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrRequestParsers;
+import org.junit.Before;
+import org.junit.BeforeClass;
+import org.junit.Rule;
+import org.junit.Test;
+import org.junit.rules.ExpectedException;
+
+public class TestNestedUpdateProcessor extends SolrTestCaseJ4 {
+
+ private static final char PATH_SEP_CHAR = '/';
+ private static final String[] childrenIds = { "2", "3" };
+ private static final String grandChildId = "4";
+ private static final String jDoc = "{\n" +
+ " \"add\": {\n" +
+ " \"doc\": {\n" +
+ " \"id\": \"1\",\n" +
+ " \"children\": [\n" +
+ " {\n" +
+ " \"id\": \"2\",\n" +
+ " \"foo_s\": \"Yaz\"\n" +
+ " \"grandChild\": \n" +
+ " {\n" +
+ " \"id\": \""+ grandChildId + "\",\n" +
+ " \"foo_s\": \"Jazz\"\n" +
+ " },\n" +
+ " },\n" +
+ " {\n" +
+ " \"id\": \"3\",\n" +
+ " \"foo_s\": \"Bar\"\n" +
+ " }\n" +
+ " ]\n" +
+ " }\n" +
+ " }\n" +
+ "}";
+
+ private static final String noIdChildren = "{\n" +
+ " \"add\": {\n" +
+ " \"doc\": {\n" +
+ " \"id\": \"1\",\n" +
+ " \"children\": [\n" +
+ " {\n" +
+ " \"foo_s\": \"Yaz\"\n" +
+ " \"grandChild\": \n" +
+ " {\n" +
+ " \"foo_s\": \"Jazz\"\n" +
+ " },\n" +
+ " },\n" +
+ " {\n" +
+ " \"foo_s\": \"Bar\"\n" +
+ " }\n" +
+ " ]\n" +
+ " }\n" +
+ " }\n" +
+ "}";
+
+ private static final String errDoc = "{\n" +
+ " \"add\": {\n" +
+ " \"doc\": {\n" +
+ " \"id\": \"1\",\n" +
+ " \"children" + PATH_SEP_CHAR + "a\": [\n" +
+ " {\n" +
+ " \"id\": \"2\",\n" +
+ " \"foo_s\": \"Yaz\"\n" +
+ " \"grandChild\": \n" +
+ " {\n" +
+ " \"id\": \""+ grandChildId + "\",\n" +
+ " \"foo_s\": \"Jazz\"\n" +
+ " },\n" +
+ " },\n" +
+ " {\n" +
+ " \"id\": \"3\",\n" +
+ " \"foo_s\": \"Bar\"\n" +
+ " }\n" +
+ " ]\n" +
+ " }\n" +
+ " }\n" +
+ "}";
+
+ @Rule
+ public ExpectedException thrown = ExpectedException.none();
--- End diff --
It seems like if I use updateJ(), I do not build the SolrRequest have
manually any more, which will only complicate the test. You will probably be
able to see it when I push the new commits.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
