[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16546660#comment-16546660
]
David Smiley commented on LUCENE-8306:
--------------------------------------
I did a little review:
* Shouldn't label() return the associated Query? If not then how might a
highlighter do anything useful with it? The only thing I can imagine is simply
recursively count the distinct label as a heuristic a match finding more or
less terms than some other match. Even if one could *also* do that with a
Query, a Query seems intrinsically more useful rather than some opaque Object.
* the changes to SloppyPhraseMatcher seemed like maybe you fixed bugs too?
e.g. startOffset being idempotent, if I'm reading that correctly
* In SloppyPhraseMatcher.getSubMatches, is it really necessary to build up
this {{int[][] submatches = new int[phrasePositions.length][3];}} thing vs
working on PhrasePositions directly?
* Shouldn't TermMatchesIterator.getSubMatches return EMPTY? It's already a
leaf.
> Allow iteration over the term positions of a Match
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8306
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8306
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Alan Woodward
> Assignee: Alan Woodward
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: LUCENE-8306.patch, LUCENE-8306.patch, LUCENE-8306.patch
>
>
> For multi-term queries such as phrase queries, the matches API currently just
> returns information about the span of the whole match. It would be useful to
> also expose information about the matching terms within the phrase. The same
> would apply to Spans and Interval queries.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
